Sixth Circuit Agrees that Michigan Primary Petition This Year Is Unconstitutional, But Says U.S. District Court Judge Should Have Let State Write a New Requirement

On May 5, the Sixth Circuit issued an order in Esshaki v Whitmer, 20-1336, the case over whether the Michigan primary petition requirements were too severe this year due to the health crisis.  The panel agreed that the original requirement was too difficult to be constitutional for 2020.  But it said that the U.S. District Court should merely have ruled that it was too difficult, and let the state decide what to replace it with.

The majority decision is not signed, but was authored by either Judge Alice M. Batchelder, a Bush Sr. appointee; or Judge John K. Bush, a Trump appointee.  The third judge, Jane B. Stranch, an Obama appointee, felt the U.S. District Court acted appropriately when he set a new petition standard of 50% of the original requirement.  Judge Stranch’s dissent is longer than the majority order, and cites many instances when the U.S. Supreme Court approved lower court orders that imposed specific policies (to be in place temporarily) when the old law was invalidated.

U.S. District Court Orders New York to Proceed With Presidential Primary

On May 5, U.S. District Court Judge Analisa Torres, an Obama appointee, ordered the New York State Board of Elections to proceed with the Democratic presidential primary.  Yang v Kellner, s.d., 1:20cv-3325.  The lawsuit had been filed by Andrew Yang, some of his candidates for delegate to the Democratic National Convention, and some voters who want to vote for him, even though he has suspended his campaign.

The decision points out that delegates have other duties than just choosing a presidential nominee.  They help write the party platform and can and do interact with the presumptive presidential nominee to influence him or her on the coming campaign.  See page 21 of the decision.

New York’s government said it cancelled the primary because of the health crisis.  The decision says that reason is not convincing, because in most counties, there was going to be a primary (for office other than president) on the same day, June 23, anyway.  Thanks to Political Wire for this news.

Eleventh Circuit Will Hear Libertarian Challenge to U.S. House 5% Petition on May 22

The Eleventh Circuit will hear Cowen v Raffensperger, 19-14065, on Friday, May 22.  This is the case filed in 2017 against the Georgia petition requirement for independent and minor party candidates for U.S. House.

The 5% (of the number of registered voters) requirement has existed for U.S. House since 1943.  No minor party has ever complied with it in 77 years.  No independent has complied with it since 1964, and back then the petition validity wasn’t checked, no district crossed county lines, and the petition deadline was in October.

Nevertheless, the U.S. District Court had upheld it in 2019.

The three judges will be Adalberto Jordan, Gerald Tjoflat, and R. Lanier Anderson.  The hearing will be by telephone.

Minnesota Libertarian Party Files Reply Brief in Ballot Access Case

On April 28, the Minnesota Libertarian Party filed this reply brief in its ballot access case, Libertarian Party of Minnesota v Simon, 0:19cv-2312.  This case was filed in 2019 and is not concerned with the health crisis.  It attacks the Minnesota law that restricts independent petitions (and petitions for the nominees of unqualified parties) to a collection period of only 14 days.  However, if the petition is for president, the petition period is 92 days.

The lawsuit also attacks the law that says the petition signers must say, by their signature, that they do not intend to vote in the upcoming primary for the same office.

Washington, D.C., City Council Passes Bill Lowering Number of Signatures for Some Offices

On May 5, the Washington, D.C., city council passed B23-0751.  It makes many changes to laws of all kinds, relating to the health crisis.  Section 23 of the bill lowers the number of signatures needed for a petition to place a candidate for Delegate to the U.S. House, or city-council-at-large, on the November ballot, from 3,000 signatures to 250 signatures.

The bill lowers the general election petition for city council from a ward from 500 signatures to 150 signatures.

The bill also says blank candidate petitions, and initiative petitions, can now be sent to potential signers electronically.  Potential signers must then print the blank petition on their home printer.  They may sign the printed paper, and e-mail the signature with a scan back to the campaign office that is collecting the signatures.  Or, of course, they can also postally mail the sheet back.  The bill also eliminates the requirement that petitions be on legal size paper.  They can now be on standard 8.5 inch by eleven inch paper.

Oddly, the bill does not seem to lower the number of signatures for independent presidential candidates, or the presidential nominees of unqualified parties.