On March 7, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear Thompson v DeWine, 21-1120, the case over whether ballot access relief should be given to initiative proponents during a health crisis.
Search Results for: Ohio
On March 3, several organizations filed an amicus curiae brief in the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of the petitioners, in Thompson v DeWine, 21-1120. This is the Ohio case on whether the state should have given petitioning relief to … Continue reading
The U.S. Supreme Court will consider whether to hear Thompson v DeWine, 21-1120, at its March 4 conference. This is the case over whether Ohio should have given petitioning relief for initiatives during the health crisis. … Continue reading
On February 18, some Ohio voters filed a federal lawsuit, asking the federal court to take the responsibility for choosing a redistricting plan for legislative seats. The Ohio Redistricting Commission plans have twice been rejected by the State Supreme Court. … Continue reading
On February 14, Ohio informed the U.S. Supreme Court that it doesn’t expect to respond to the cert petition in Thompson v DeWine, 21-1120, the case over whether the state should have granted petitioning relief for initiative petitions during the … Continue reading