Two U.S. District Court Judges Grant Particular Kinds of Relief to Georgia Voters

On November 13, U.S. District Court Judge Leigh May issued an injunction, allowing provisional ballots to be counted even though the voter omitted the year of birth. The order applies to Gwinnett County, which had been rejecting such ballots. Martin v Crittenden, n.d., 1:18cv-4776.

On November 12, U.S. District Court Judge Amy Totenberg issued an injunction, allowing more time for provisional voters to return to the elections office and validate their provisional ballots by showing I.D. Common Cause of Georgia v Kemp, 1:18cv-5102. This case had not been filed until November 5. Thanks to Rick Hasen for news about both of these decisions.

Republican Congressman from Maine Files Federal Lawsuit to Enjoin Ranked Choice Voting

On November 13, Republican Congressman Bruce Poliquin and some voters in his district filed a federal lawsuit to enjoin the use of ranked choice voting in last week’s election. Baber v Dunlap, 1:18cv-465. The case is assigned to Judge Lance E. Walker, a Trump appointee. Here is the 25-page complaint.

The first choice vote count shows that Poliquin has 2,000 more votes than his Democratic opponent, Jared Golden. However, 8% of the voters used their first choice votes to support one of the two independent candidates in the race. When the ranked choice process counts the next round, virtually everyone expects Golden will win. Golden has already asked to intervene in the case. Thanks to Political Wire for this news.

Georgia Will Hold December Run-Off for Secretary of State and Public Service Commissioner

Georgia requires a runoff after a general election, if no one got 50%. According to the unofficial election returns, Georgia will need a runoff in December for Secretary of State and Public Service Commissioner 3. See the election returns here. The presence of Libertarian candidates prevented anyone from getting 50%.

In the Secretary of State race, the results now are: Republican 49.13%; Democratic 48.64%; Libertarian 2.23%.

For Public Service Commission seat three: Republican 49.74%; Democratic 47.60%; Libertarian 2.66%.

Mike Schaefer, California Voting Rights Attorney, Seems Likely to Win Partisan Race for Board of Equalization

The most obscure California partisan elected office is Board of Equalization. The state is divided into four districts, each of which elects a member to the State Board of Equalization, which deals with taxes.

As of Monday morning, November 12, Mike Schaefer, a Democrat, has 49.8% of the votes against his Republican opponent, State Senator Joel Anderson. California still has millions of uncounted ballots, and there is a strong tendency for the late-counted ballots to be more Democratic than Republican. It is quite likely that when all the ballots are counted, Schaefer will have won the election.

Schaefer has been a champion of write-in voting. In 1986 he was the attorney who won a decision from the California Supreme Court, Canaan v Abdelnour, that both the U.S. Constitution and the California constitution protect the right of voters to cast a write-in vote. He had sued San Diego, which did not permit write-ins in city run-off elections, and he won the case 6-1.

But, that win for voting rights was wiped out by the California Supreme Court in 2002, in another case Schaefer handled, Edelstein v Nishioka. San Francisco, in its last Mayoral election before switching to ranked choice voting, barred write-ins in its December 1999 Mayoral runoff. A write-in candidate sued and won in the State Court of Appeals in 2001, but the next year the California Supreme Court reversed, and wiped out the Canaan precedent. That is why California has been able to ban write-ins for Congress and partisan state office in general elections.

Schaefer also won a landmark qualifications case, when he represented himself in Schaefer v Townsend. In that case, the 9th circuit ruled in June 2000 that Article One of the U.S. Constitution does not permit states to require congressional candidates to be registered voters. Schaefer at the time wanted to run in a special congressional election in California, but he was barred from the ballot because he was not a registered California voter. He couldn’t register in California because he was a resident of Las Vegas at the time. California asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Schaefer’s win, but the Supreme Court declined to hear the state’s appeal.

Schaefer’s likely win in this month’s election has received little press attention so far. He is 80 years old, has run for other elected office dozens of times over the last few decades in Maryland, Nevada, and California, and had not come close to winning. He had been elected to the San Diego city council when he was in his 20’s, but had not won an election since then.

Bill Whalen, Hoover Institution Fellow, Says California’s Top-Two May Need Some Repair

Bill Whalen, a long-time Hoover Institution Fellow, says in his column here that the California top-two system “may need some repair.” He cites the tendency of voters to simply skip voting in partisan races with only two candidates from the same party. He himself says he voted for Kevin De Leon for U.S. Senate last week, not because he agrees with De Leon, but because he wanted to “punish” Dianne Feinstein.