West Virginia Lawsuit Over Who Can Be on Ballot for State Supreme Court Justice to be Heard Monday, September 24

West Virginia still doesn’t know which candidates for State Supreme Court Justice will be on the November 2018 ballot. The oral argument in the case to settle that will be Monday, September 24, at 10 a.m. Because so many incumbent members of the Supreme Court are the subject of the litigation, naturally they are not able to adjudicate their own case. Four lower court judges have been appointed as temporary justices to handle the case. See this story.

Nevada Lower State Court Disqualifies Primary Winner Because He Didn’t File Campaign Finance Reports on Time

Last week, a Nevada state trial court declared that Jason Burke can’t be on the November ballot as the Republican nominee for State Assembly, district 5, because he didn’t file a campaign finance report on time. See this story. It is not clear what will happen next. Thanks to the Institute for Free Speech for the link.

Judges in Pending California Ballot Access Case are Notified About Recent Similar Michigan Decision

On September 20, Rocky De La Fuente notified the Ninth Circuit of last month’s decision in Graveline v Johnson. De La Fuente is currently challenging the California petition requirement for independent presidential candidates in the Ninth Circuit. The California requirement in 2016 was 178,039 signatures, to be collected in 105 days. In 2020 it will probably be approximately 200,000 signatures.

Last month, a U.S. District Court in Michigan enjoined Michigan’s statewide independent petition, which was exactly 30,000 signatures, and which had to be completed in 180 days. The Michigan decision relies on the fact that only twice since the law was created in 1988 had any statewide petition succeeded (Ross Perot in 1992 and Ralph Nader in 2004). The Michigan court relied on the U.S. Supreme Court’s teaching that if a petition requirement is seldom used, it is probably too difficult.

The California independent presidential petition has not been used since 1992. Nevertheless, a U.S. District Court in Los Angeles upheld it, without even permitting a trial. The new filing by De La Fuente informs the Ninth Circuit about the Michigan decision. Here is De La Fuente’s filing with the Ninth Circuit, concerning the Michigan decision.