On August 22, the Eleventh Circuit issued this opinion in Fort Lauderdale Food Not Bombs v City of Fort Lauderdate, 16-16808. The issue was a city ordinance that curtailed the activity of the organization. It regularly serves free food in a social setting, to express its viewpoint that “society can end hunger and poverty if we redirect our collective resources from the military and war.” The U.S. District Court had ruled that this is not free speech activity, but the Eleventh Circuit said it is.
Although this is not an election law case, it illustrates the robust protection for free speech activity in public parks. That issue is related to election law because so many parties and candidates must circulate petitions, and access to public parks and similar government property is so important for successful petitioning.