Independent Candidate for Ohio Local Office Defeats Challenge to his Ballot Status

On August 6, the Logan County, Ohio Board of Elections voted to keep independent candidate Ben Stahler on the ballot. He is running for President of the Bellefontaine city council. He was challenged on the basis that he is not a true independent. He had attended a Republican Party dinner on March 31, 2025, the day before he filed his petition to be on the ballot as an independent. See this story.

Ohio has the nation’s most arbitrary law on who can be an independent candidate. It is common for challengers to cite personal behavior. If Ohio had registration by party, the law wouldn’t be so arbitrary. But the Ohio voter registration form does not ask about partisan affiliation or the lack of it.

U.S. District Court Upholds Texas’ Discriminatory Law on Filing Fees

On August 6, U.S. District Court Judge Robert Pitman, an Obama appointee, upheld the discriminatory Texas law on filing fee distribution. When a candidate of a party that nominates by primary, the filing fee paid by that candidate goes to that candidate’s party. But when a candidate of a party that nominates by convention pays a filing fee, the government keeps the money.
Here is the decision. Bilyeu v Esparza, w.d., 1:21cv-1089.

Common Cause National Board of Directors Considering Change to Staunch Anti-Gerrymandering Position

Here is an interesting story from The Christian Science Monitor stating that due to the current multistate US House redistricting brouhaha, the national Board of Directors is considering a change to its universal opposition to partisan gerrymandering.

Thanks again to that prolific purveyor of political punditry, politicalwire.com.

Cornel West Supporters in North Carolina File Response Brief in Ballot Access Case

On August 4, the voters who supported Cornel West’s ballot position in North Carolina filed this brief in their ballot access case. Although the U.S. District Court had put Cornel West’s party on the ballot last year, the case is still alive because West and his supporters are seeking a federal court decision that the State Board of Elections last year violated the U.S. Constitution when it kept his party off the ballot even though it had enough valid signatures.

The purpose of getting a declaratory judgment in this case is to avoid the same problem in future elections. Ortiz v North Carolina State Board of Elections, e.d., 5:24cv-420.