Michigan Supreme Court Hears 90 Minutes of Oral Argument over Redistricting Initiative

On Wednesday, July 18, the Michigan Supreme Court heard 90 minutes of argument over whether an initiative to create a nonpartisan redistricting commission should be on the ballot. See this story. Everyone agrees that the initiative had enough valid signatures, but state government officials say the measure can’t be on the ballot because it is a revision, not an amendment. However, there is no definition of those terms in the State Constitution.

U.S. District Court Hears Case Against New Hampshire Law that Permits Election Officials to Discard Absentee Ballots without Warning if Signature Doesn’t Match

On July 16, a U.S. District Court heard a case challenging the practice of New Hampshire election officials, relative to absentee mail ballots. The practice is to discard such ballots, without telling the voter, if the official believes the voter’s signature on the ballot envelope doesn’t match the voter’s signature on the voter registration application. The case is Saucedo v New Hampshire Secretary of State, 1:17cv-183. See this story.

The case is before U.S. District Court Judge Landya McCafferty, an Obama appointee.