Congressmember Michael Bost Files U.S. Supreme Court Brief on Standing

On July 22, Illinois Congressmember Michael Bost filed his brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in Bost v Illinois State Board of Elections, 24-568. The issue is whether he had standing to challenge the Illinois law that postal ballots should be counted if they arrive within 14 days of the election, assuming they are postmarked by election day. The lower courts had ruled that he does’t have standing to challenge the Illinois law.

His brief makes a forceful statement that candidates always have standing to challenge election laws that affect them. The case will be argued in the fall of 2025.

Ninth Circuit Agrees with Lower Court that President Trump Can’t Enforce His Birthright Citizenship Order

On July 23, the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in State of Washington v Trump, 25-807. It agrees with the U.S. District Court, which had enjoined President Trump’s order on birthright citizenship. This is the first Appellate ruling on this issue. The opinion is by Judge Ronald Gould, a Clinton appointee. It is also signed by Judge Michael Daly Hawkins, a Clinton appointee, and by Judge Patrick Bumatay, a Trump appointee. Here is the 78-page document.

Fair Representation Act Again Introduced in the U.S. House

On July 23, the Fair Representation Act was again introduced into the U.S. House of Representatives by Congressmembers Don Beyer of Virginia and Jamie Raskin of Maryland.
See this press release.

The bill would provide for multi-member U.S. House districts in most states, and would be a type of proportional representation. UPDATE: the bill is HR 4632.

Second Circuit Still Hasn’t Explained Why Jim Walden Can’t Have “Independence” as his Ballot Label

Jim Walden is an independent candidate for Mayor of New York City. On May 2, 2025, the Second Circuit issued a one-sentence order, denying his request for “Independence” to be his ballot label, and saying it would explain later. It is almost three months since then, and the Second Circuit still hasn’t issued an explanation of why he can’t use his label. Walden v Kosinski, 25-764.

Canadian Electoral Reform Organization Causes 128 Candidates to File for House of Commons Special Election, as a Protest

Canada is holding a special election on August 18 to fill a vacancy in the House of Commons, in the Battle River-Crowfoot district in Alberta. Canadian ballot access is easy. Candidates for House of Commons need 100 signatures and a filing fee of $1,000. The Longest Ballot Committee, a group that favors proportional representation and/or ranked choice voting, has caused 128 candidates to file for the special election, as a protest against the status quo electoral system.

Here is the list of candidates. The filing deadline is July 28 so the list may grow between now and then.

Fortunately for voters, the list of candidates is in alphabetical order. When California held its special gubernatorial election in 2003, there were 135 candidates and they were not in alphabetical order.

The protest idea may cause the Canadian ballot access law to become more difficult. See this story, which says that Conservative Party leader wants to increase the petition from 100 signatures to 1,000 signatures, and also to provide that a voter may sign for only one candidate.