Utah Republican Party Rehearing in Lawsuit over How Party Nominates

On April 18, the Utah Republican Party filed this request for rehearing in Utah Republican Party v Cox, 16-4091. The issue is the state law that forces the party to let candidates without substantial support at a party meeting petition onto the party’s primary ballot. The party is not opposed to having a primary, but it only wants candidates on its primary ballot with significant support at party endorsement meetings. The Tenth Circuit had upheld the law by a vote of 2-1.

On April 19, the Tenth Circuit asked the state to respond to the petition for rehearing. This is a good sign for the party. Generally when courts receive a request for rehearing, they do not ask the other side to respond, and typically then reject the rehearing request. The state’s response is due May 15.

Progressive Magazine Story on How Local Initiatives Are Being Kept Off Ballots because of their Content

The Progressive Magazine has this story about the many instances when local initiatives are being kept off ballots because of their content. The old rule for initiatives all across the nation is that if there is a constitutional infirmity with the idea proposed by the initiative, courts won’t consider that until after the initiative has passed, if it does pass. But now the trend is shifting, according to the story, to keeping them off the ballot before any popular vote is held.

U.S. Citizens Who Live in Guam, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands, Ask U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Their Voting Rights Case

On April 23, some U.S. citizens who formerly lived in Illinois, and who moved to Guam, Puerto Rico, or the U.S. Virgin Islands, asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Segovia v U.S, 17-1463. Here is the cert petition.

Illinois law would have permitted them to continue voting by absentee ballot if they had moved to any foreign country, or to American Samoa. But they can’t vote any longer because they now live in one of the three above-listed U.S. territories.

The Seventh Circuit had ruled that they lack standing to sue.

Georgia Secretary of State Appoints 18-Member Commission to Study Vote-Counting Machines, Including a Representative of the Libertarian Party

On April 23, Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp appointed an 18-person committee to study what kind of vote-counting machines Georgia ought to obtain. He included one representative from the Democratic, Republican, and Libertarian Parties. See this story. It is somewhat ironic that Kemp treated the Libertarian Party well relative to this matter, and yet is in court fighting to prevent the Libertarian Party from running candidates for U.S. House of Representatives.

Colorado Supreme Court Removes Incumbent Republican Congressman from Primary Ballot Because His Circulators Weren’t Residents of Colorado

On April 23, the Colorado Supreme Court unanimously removed Congressman Doug Lamborn from the Republican primary ballot. He has been in Congress since the 2006 election and he intends to run for re-election. He was removed because two of his petition circulators were not residents of Colorado when they worked on his petition. The petition requires 1,000 signatures of registered Republicans.

The case is Kuhn v Williams, 2018 CO 30. The decision is 28 pages.

In 2008, the Tenth Circuit ruled in an Oklahoma case that bans on out-of-state circulators are unconstitutional. Yes on Term Limits v Savage, 550 F.3d 1024 (2008). Colorado is in the Tenth Circuit. The Colorado Supreme Court did not mention the Yes on Term Limits decision, and said it is not expressing any opinion on whether the Colorado residency requirement for circulators is constitutional or not.

Presumably Congressman Lamborn will now bring a constitutional challenge. The Colorado primaries are on June 26, so any such constitutional case will need to move very fast. There are other Republicans on the primary ballot for the 5th district. Thanks to PoliticalWire for the news.