On April 8, Hungary held a parliamentary election. See this wikipedia article. Seven parties won at least one seat.
Colorado independent voters have never been able to vote in major party primaries, until 2018. This article presents evidence gathered by Magellin Strategies about how independent voters will act in Colorado primaries this year.
The standard academic vocabulary for the term “open primary” considers Colorado in 2018 to have a semi-closed primary, not an open primary. But the Colorado media does not conform to the standard academic word usage and says Colorado has an open primary. Actual open primary state do not have registration by party, and there are 19 actual open primary states. Colorado does have registration by party. A semi-closed primary is one in which independents can choose any party’s primary ballot, but members of parties are confined to their own party’s primary ballot.
On August 1, 2012, San Francisco Superior Court Judge Curtis Karnow ruled that I and five fellow co-plaintiffs must pay $247,279 in attorneys fees to the supporters of the California top-two system. Judge Karnow’s term is up and he is running for re-election at the June 5, 2018 primary. His opponent is Maria Evangelista, a San Francisco Public Defender.
The Bay Area Reporter, San Francisco’s leading gay newspaper, has this letter to the editor in its April 4 print and electronic editions, written by me, describing how Judge Karnow behaved in 2012. Scroll down to see my letter; the link has two entirely separate letters and mine is underneath.
After Judge Karnow ruled, we six voter-plaintiffs appealed to the State Court of Appeals. The law firm which opposed us offered to drop the amount to $100,000 if we dropped our appeal. We did so, and one of the other six plaintiffs (who does not wish to be named) very generously paid the $100,000.
The Maine Republican Senators have asked the Maine Supreme Court to block ranked-choice voting in the June 2018 primary. See this story.
On April 6, the Arizona Libertarian Party filed this reply brief in its ballot access case, Libertarian Party of Arizona v Reagan, 17-16491. The issue is the large number of signatures needed for a member of the Libertarian Party to get on the party’s primary ballot. The U.S. District Court had upheld the law, which kept all Libertarians off the primary ballot in 2016 except just one candidate for county office.
The new restrictive law, passed in 2015, does not apply to the Green Party, which had a good number of candidates on in Arizona in 2016.