Hi-Tech Investigation Into Supreme Court Justice Vocal Characteristics Predicts Extreme Partisan Gerrymandering Will be Struck Down

The Economist has this interesting article about a new method for predicting how a U.S. Supreme Court Justice will rule, based on the pitch of his or her voice when questioning attorneys at oral argument. If one scrolls down to the bottom of the article, one finds that the new method predicts that Justice Anthony Kennedy will rule against the state of Wisconsin in Gill v Whitford, the case over extreme partisan gerrymandering.

Of course, there are other more traditional reasons to expect that same result, including the fact that the Court recently took a second case on the same subject from Maryland. Thanks to How Appealing for the link.

Jill Stein Appearance on CNN Garners Publicity

On December 21, Jill Stein appeared on CNN’s “Outfront with Erin Burnett.” Here is a report about that interview in The Hill. This interview has been covered by many major news outlets.

Also, here is a link to a 45-minute interview with Stein by Robert Scheer of Truthdig.

This Salt Lake Tribune story points out that Rocky Anderson, Justice Party presidential nominee in 2012, was also at the famous Moscow dinner that Stein attended.

Pennsylvania Secretary of State Will Soon Decide on County Distribution Requirement for Statewide Minor Party and Independent Candidate Petitions

On December 21, U.S. District Court Lawrence Stengel held a status conference in Constitution Party of Pennsylvania v Cortes, 5:12cv-2726. As already reported, on December 13 the Third Circuit had issued a ruling in this case, casting doubt on whether the county distribution requirement for minor party and independent candidate statewide candidates is constitutional. It requires petitions for minor party and independent gubernatorial candidates to not only be signed by 5,000 signatures, but to have at least 250 signatures from each of ten counties. The Third Circuit had noted that such county distribution requirements have been ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court twice, and by at least ten lower court decisions from around the country.

On December 21, the minor parties suggested to Judge Stengel that his order from last year merely be changed to delete the county distribution requirement. The state said it needs two or three weeks to decide whether it accepts that idea. Judge Stengel then set a new status conference for January 10, 2018, at which it is likely this will be resolved. Of course Judge Stengel is free to make his own decision, in case both sides don’t agree. Or he might order a trial to determine whether the county distribution requirement can possibly be justified.