Deadlines to Put New Parties on the Ballot Have Already Passed in Five States

Already, deadlines for certain procedures to get new parties on the ballot for 2018 have passed in five states. With two exceptions, no new party qualified in these states.

In California, the deadline for a new party to obtain approximately 60,000 registrants, and thus be on the 2018 ballot, passed on January 2. No group came close to qualifying. This deadline had been struck down in 2015, but the decision was interpreted only to apply to presidential election years.

In Arkansas, the petition deadline for new parties was also January 2. No group submitted a petition. The only three ballot-qualified parties are Republican, Democratic, and Libertarian.

In Maine, the deadline for a group to show that it had 5,000 registered members was also January 2. No group tried. The four ballot-qualified parties are Democratic, Republican, Green, and Libertarian.

In Utah, the deadline for a group to submit a petition for party status was November 30, 2017. The Green Party met this deadline, and earlier in 2017 the United Utah Party did as well. The other qualified parties are Republican, Democratic, Libertarian, Independent American, and Constitution.

In Vermont, the deadline for one method to get a new party on the ballot, that it have town committees in ten towns, was January 1. The only group that met that requirement was the Green Mountain Party. Parties that were already on the ballot were Democratic, Republican, Progressive, Libertarian, and Liberty Union. Groups that didn’t make the January 1 deadline can still appear on the ballot in 2018 if their nominees submit petitions by August 7, 2018.

Another U.S. Court Hearing on North Carolina Legislative Districts

On January 5, a 3-judge U.S. District Court held another hearing in the case over North Carolina legislative districts. See this story. A decision is expected soon because filing for the 2018 primary opens next month.

The case is Covington v North Carolina, m.d., 1:15cv-399. The upcoming decision will decide whether to use the redrawn boundaries passed by the legislature last year, or the redrawn boundaries prepared by Law Professor Nate Persily. The state says if the court rules in favor of the Persily districts, it will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Commission on Presidential Debates Declines to Respond to Gary Johnson-Jill Stein Anti-Trust Debates Lawsuit

On January 5, the Commission on Presidential Debates told the U.S. Supreme Court that it does not intend to file a brief in the Gary Johnson-Jill Stein anti-trust debates lawsuit. Of course, if the U.S. Supreme Court later tells the Commission that it wants a response, then the Commission would comply.

U.S. District Court Says Five Michigan Legislators Must be Deposed in Lawsuit Over Straight-Ticket Device

On January 4, a U.S. District Court ruled that five Michigan legislators must sit to have their depositions taken, in the lawsuit over whether the U.S. Constitution forbids Michigan from eliminating the straight-ticket device. Michigan State A. Philip Randolph Institute v Johnson, e.d., 2:16cv-11844.

The Michigan legislature repealed the straight-ticket device early in 2016. Some voters then sued, arguing that the bill violates the U.S. Constitution because it disproportionately injures African-American voters. The U.S. District Court forced the state to leave the device in place during the 2016 general election, but the case is not decided yet. The January 4, 2018 court order says the plaintiffs can require that five legislators who were instrumental in passing the bill must sit for depositions. They include the bill’s author, and the chairs of the Election Law Committees in each house, and the Leader of the State Senate. All five are Republicans. Here is the 16-page court order.

Delaware Appeals U.S. District Court Decision That Struck Down Requirement that All State Judges Must be Democrats or Republicans

On January 5, Delaware appealed the decision of the U.S. District Court in Adams v Carney. The U.S. District Court on December 6, 2017, had struck down a Delaware law that the only people eligible to be appointed a state judge are people who are members of a political party that is entitled to its own primary. In Delaware, only parties with 5% of the registration are entitled to a primary, so effectively only Democrats and Republicans may be appointed to a state judicial position.

The plaintiff who won the case in U.S. District Court, James R. Adams, is a registered independent.