Two Libertarians for Pennsylvania Local Partisan Office Defeat Challenges to their Ballot Status

On August 17, two Libertarian Party candidates for local partisan office in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, won decisions in state court that they should remain on the ballot.

Jennifer Moore, running for Auditor of Upper Providence Township, was originally told that she needed ten signatures, but the elections office made a mistake, and the law requires that she submit forty-six.  Judge Emanuel A. Bertin of the Court of Common Pleas said because she was misinformed by the county elections office, she may have additional time to get the extra signatures.  Her petition is now due September 8.  That case was Vagnozzi v Lambrugo and Moore, 2017-20079.

Marc Bozzacco, running for Abington Township Commissioner, like all candidates for local office, was required to file his Statement of Financial Interests with both the county elections office and the clerk of Abington Township.  Although he filed in both places, his filing with the township office was late.  But Judge Bertin put him on the ballot anyway, because the individual who challenged his candidacy had not written his challenge to show what Bozzacco had done wrong.  That case was Kalinoski v Lambrugo and Bozzacco, 2017-20026.  Thanks to Richard Schwarz for the news.

Arizona Project Vote Lawsuit Resulted in Making List of Registered Voters Far Cheaper

Last year, Project Vote sued the Arizona Secretary of State over the high price for a member of the public to obtain the list of registered voters.  Mostly in response to the lawsuit, this year the legislature passed HB 2412, which lowers the cost of obtaining the statewide list electronically from approximately $30,000 to approximately $500.

Afterwards, Project Vote withdrew the lawsuit, which had been Project Vote, Inc. v Reagan, 2:16cv-1253.

New York Supreme Court Explains Why Petition Signatures with Abbreviation for Name of City are Valid

On August 16, New York Supreme Court Justice Lawrence H. Ecker issued a 16-page ruling in Swiller v Lecuona, 2320/17.  He said that petition signatures in which the signer only wrote “W.P.” instead of “White Plains” for city are valid.  He wrote “An individual who is otherwise lawfully entitled to sign a petition in support of his/her candidate of choice should not be automatically eliminated because he or she used an obvious, common sense, unequivocal manner in which he or she demonstrated residence in White Plains.”  See page eleven.

The decision deals with other parts of the challenge to the petition.  The petitions had been filed by some candidates running in the Democratic primary for Mayor and City Council in White Plains.