Arkansas Plans to Ask for U.S. Supreme Court Review, in Case Over Petition Deadline for Non-Presidential Independent Candidates

As already reported, on April 26, the Eighth Circuit ruled that the March petition deadline for non-presidential independent candidates is likely unconstitutional unless the state can show that it must have a deadline that early, in order to have time to check the validity of such petitions. Moore v Martin, 15-3558. Therefore, the judges remanded the case back to U.S. District Court to give the state an opportunity to demonstrate its needs. One of the three judges, however, wrote that the deadline is clearly unconstitutional and there is no need for a remand.

Arkansas has decided to appeal this decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. Its cert petition is due July 25. It is very unusual for a state to ask for U.S. Supreme Court review when it loses a constitutional ballot access case. The last instance was in 2009, when Arizona asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse the Ninth Circuit opinion in Nader v Brewer, which struck down the Arizona independent presidential petition deadline of June. The Supreme Court denied Arizona’s request. The Arizona legislature then moved that deadline to September, one of the latest such deadlines in the nation.

Eleventh Circuit Wants Oral Argument in Case Involving Petition Requirements in Special Elections

On June 28, the Eleventh Circuit said it wants oral argument in Hall v Merrill, 16-16766. This is the case on whether Alabama can require petitions of 3% of the last gubernatorial vote, for independent candidates and newly-qualifying parties, in special elections. Last year the U.S. District Court had ruled that because the petitioning time is so short in special elections, the state can’t require such a high number of signatures. The state then filed a notice of appeal to the Eleventh Circuit. Briefs are already submitted.

Michigan Legislature Passes Bill Removing Logos from Ballot

On June 28, the Michigan Senate passed HB 4177. It removes party logos from ballots. It had already passed the House. The Senate vote was 26-9. The bill now goes to the Governor.

This action will help the state win its lawsuit over whether it is legal to repeal the straight-ticket device. The Michigan legislature repealed the straight-ticket device early in 2016, but then a U.S. District Court enjoined the repeal. Michigan State A. Philip Randolph v Johnson, e.d., 2:16cv-11844. Supporters of the straight-ticket device argued that without the straight-ticket device, some voters would think they could draw a circle around a party logo, and that would be the same as a straight-ticket device.

But if party logos no longer exist, then that fear vanishes.

Ninth Circuit Desires to Hold Oral Argument in Independent Party v Padilla in October

The Ninth Circuit has told attorneys on both sides in Independent Party v Padilla that it wishes to hold oral argument in October. The exact date of the hearing will be determined after the attorneys let the court clerk know their availability. The case is 16-15895. The lawsuit challenges the California Secretary of State’s determination that the Independent Party cannot register itself as a political body, because the name is too similar to the already-existing California party called the American Independent Party.

Because the Secretary of State has never accepted the Independent Party’s political body status, no one knows how many registered voters the Independent Party has. If it has as many as approximately 65,000, then it would qualify as a political party.

Ballot-qualified parties named the Independent Party exist, or have existed sometime in the last 40 years, in Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maryland, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, and Utah.

Maine Ranked Choice Voting is Still Unresolved

Both houses of the Maine legislature passed LD 1625 on June 27. But the House version retains ranked choice voting for all primaries, and for congressional general elections. The Senate version repeals ranked choice voting for all office.

No further action has taken place on June 28, so far, as of 12:15 pm Maine time. No one knows how much longer the legislature will remain in session.