Here is a link to the Nick Troiano interview conducted on April 26 by radio host Michael Smerconish. Troiano is a spokesperson for The Centrist Project, which hopes to elect independent centrists to congress in 2018. The link is via IVN.
On April 26, the Oklahoma House passed SB 323, which raises filing fees. The bill also alters the formula for how many signatures are needed in lieu of the filing fee. The number of signatures needed becomes slightly lower for Republicans, slightly higher for Democrats, far higher for Libertarians and any other minor parties who qualify in the future, and much lower for independent candidates. UPDATE: the bill is not through the legislature yet. The House version is slightly different than the Senate version, so it must pass the Senate again, or go to a conference committee. An earlier version of this post said the bill had passed entirely through the legislature. Thanks to E. Zachary Knight for the update.
The old formula for petitions in lieu of filing fee was 4% of the registered voters who were eligible to vote for that candidate in the primary (except that in the case of independents, it was 4% of the number of all registered voters). The new formula pays no attention to how many registered voters there are in each party, and instead is 2% of all the registered voters.
As to the amount of the fees, president rises from $2,500 to $5,000; Governor from $1,500 to $2,000; U.S. Senate from $1,000 to $2,000; U.S. House from $750 to $1,000.
The bill’s provision for signatures in lieu of filing fee is possibly unconstitutional as to candidates from small qualified parties, because they would be forced to seek signatures from people who are not members of their party, even though they are seeking to place themselves on their own party’s primary ballot. In Oklahoma, all parties nominate by primary.
The analysis of the bill prepared for legislators falsely claimed that the number of signatures in lieu of the filing fee would decrease for all candidates. Also, on the floor, the sponsor of the bill falsely claimed that the number of signatures in lieu of the fee would decrease for all candidates. Thanks to E. Zachary Knight for this news.
Ballot Access News
April 1, 2017 – Volume 32, Number 11
| This issue was printed on violet paper. |
Table of Contents
- IOWA REPEAL OF STRAIGHT-TICKET PASSES BOTH HOUSES
- OKLAHOMA SENATE PASSES TWO BALLOT ACCESS BILLS
- MARYLAND HOUSE PASSES ACCESS BILL
- TENNESSEE ACCESS BILL ADVANCES
- NEBRASKA ACCESS BILL ADVANCES
- NEW BALLOT ACCESS IMPROVEMENT BILLS
- NATIONAL POPULAR VOTE PLAN BILLS
- NORTH CAROLINA MOVES INDEPENDENT PETITION DEADLINE FROM JUNE TO APRIL
- NEW ACCESS LAWSUITS
- FEC NOT LIKELY TO HELP WITH DEBATES
- MAINE HEARING DATE FOR RANKED-CHOICE
- U.S. SUPREME COURT AND OPEN PRIMARIES
- RESOURCE FOR BALLOT ACCESS ATTORNEYS
- U.S. SUPREME COURT AND PARTISAN GERRYMANDERING
- ILLINOIS LIBERTARIANS WIN CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAWSUIT
- UTAH RANKED CHOICE VOTING BILL
- ALABAMA LAWSUIT ON SPECIAL U.S. SENATE ELECTION THIS YEAR
- WHICH STATES GIVE GROUPS TWO METHODS TO BECOME A QUALIFIED PARTY?
- WRITE-IN CANDIDATE ELECTED TO PENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATURE
- ROCKY DE LA FUENTE SEEKS REPUBLICAN NOMINATION FOR MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY
- COFOE BOARD MEETING
- WORKING FAMILIES PARTY WILL ATTEMPT TO WIN SPECIAL LEGISLATIVE ELECTION IN CONNECTICUT
- 2018 PETITIONING
- FRANCE HOLDS FIVE-CANDIDATE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE
- NETHERLANDS ELECTION
- SUBSCRIBING TO BAN WITH PAYPAL
The Georgia legislature has adjourned for the year, and neither of the bills to improve ballot access made any headway. They are HB 133, which cuts the number of signatures for independent candidates and new parties; and SB 112, which eliminates all mandatory ballot access petitions.
However, Georgia has a two-year legislative session, so they might make progress in 2018. Now that the state has lost the lawsuit over the number of signatures for minor party and independent presidential candidates, it seems likely some bill will pass next year.
Except in 1976, Nevada has never had a presidential primary. This year, attempts were made by some legislators to establish presidential primaries for Nevada, but neither bill passed, and it is now too late for them to pass. They were AB 293 and SB 211. See this story.