North Dakota House Committee Hears Testimony on Ballot Access Bill

On January 27, the North Dakota House Government & Veterans Affairs Committee heard testimony on HB 1417, the ballot access bill. It lowers the number of votes for a party to remain on the ballot from 5% to 2%, and deletes the requirement that a party attract between one-tenth and one-seventh of all the primary voters to choose its primary ballot, if it wants to nominate candidates for the legislature.

The hearing went well. Eric Olson testified on behalf of the Libertarian Party in favor of the bill, and no one testified against it. The committee members who expressed an opinion seemed favorably disposed toward the bill. The committee will vote next week.

Maryland Governor Refuses to Allow State Board of Elections to Include Ballot Access Improvement in Omnibus Election Law Bill

In September 2016, the Maryland State Board of Elections drafted a proposed 2017 omnibus election law bill that includes a provision to lower the number of signatures for statewide independent candidates from approximately 40,000 signatures, to exactly 10,000 signatures. But in December 2016, Maryland Governor Larry Hogan, a Republican, ordered the Board to delete that provision from its bill. Thus, the bill, HB 143, has no ballot access provision.

The Governor’s action is a surprise, because last year U.S. District Court Judge George L. Russell denied the government’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit Dorsey v Lamone, 1:15cv-2170. The lawsuit charges that because Maryland requires 10,000 signatures for an entire new party to get on the ballot, there can’t be any state interest in requiring a single statewide independent candidate to submit four times as many signatures. The judge wrote that the lawsuit states a plausible claim, but did not issue an opinion on declaratory relief. Afterwards, the State Board of Elections signed an agreement that if the plaintiff would dismiss the lawsuit without prejudice, the Board would ask the legislature to lower the independent statewide petition to exactly 10,000. Also the board said it would only require 10,000 signatures for any statewide independent during 2016 and 2017 (there is no scheduled statewide election in 2017 but theoretically there might be a special election).

It would still be possible for the 2017 session of the legislature to lower the number of signatures, even if that provision is not in one particular election law bill. Under the agreement, the plaintiff-candidate, Greg Dorsey, is free to re-file his lawsuit if the legislature does nothing.

California Sets Special U.S. House Election for April 4

California will hold a special election for U.S. House, 34th district, on April 4. The vacancy exists because Congressman Xavier Becerra resigned to become Attorney General of California.

There will probably be six or seven special elections for U.S. House in the first seven months of 2017. It had been thought that the first one would be the Kansas election, but the Kansas election is set for April 11.

Initiative for California Independence Now Ready to Start Collecting Signatures

On January 26, the California Secretary of State said the proponents of an initiative for California independence may begin to collect signatures. They need 585,407 valid signatures by July 25, 2017. Here is the organization’s web page. The initiative, which hopes to be on the ballot in November 2018, would ask voters if they want to authorize a special election in 2019 for independence. At that 2019 vote, the measure would not take effect unless it got 55% “yes” and unless at least 50% of the registered voters participated.