North Carolina State Board of Elections Proposes Regulations to Complicate New Party Petitioning

The North Carolina State Board of Elections has proposed regulations concerning petitioning for new parties. They include requiring the names of all petitioners to be registered with the State Board before they can petition. Also, the party would need to train each potential petitioner.

Similar laws are being challenged in Arkansas in a federal lawsuit filed by the Arkansas League of Women Voters.

The North Carolina board intends that these new regulations (which are not yet passed) would go into effect July 1.

Massachusetts Forward Party Holds Organizing Meeting

On May 4, the Massachusetts Forward Party held its founding convention. See this story. It hopes to be a ballot-qualified party by the 2028 election. To do that, it either needs to increase its registration to 1% of the state total, or to run a candidate for a statewide office in 2026 who receives 3% of the vote.

The meeting was hosted by Kerry Healey, who was the Lieutenant Governor of Massachusetts 2002-2006, and the Republican nominee for Governor in 2006. She is the Executive Chair of the national Forward Party.

New Jersey Litigation Over Primary Ballot Format Still Isn’t Over

Even though a U.S. District Court enjoined the old New Jersey ballot format for primary elections last year, the lawsuit continues. Plaintiffs want a permanent injunction that the old format is unconstitutional. Some of the Defendants and intervenors, including the Democratic Party of Camden County, insist that the lawsuit is now moot and no such order is needed.

On April 23,, the plaintiffs filed a brief in favor of a further court order. Kim v Hanlon, 3:24cv-1098. The old primary ballot format put the candidates favored by the party organizations in a better spot on the primary ballot, and let the party-endorsed candidates all in the same favorable column.

Second Circuit Refuses to Let Independent Candidate for Mayor of New York Use “Independence” as His Ballot Label

On May 2, the Second Circuit refused to order New York election officials to let Jim Walden use the ballot label “Independence”. He is running for Mayor of New York city. The Second Circuit did not explain its reasoning, but said it will do so later. Walden v Kosinski, 25-764.

The case was before Judges Gerald Lynch and Alison Nathan (Obama appointees) and Eunice C. Lee (Biden).

The same law would also have banned the word “Independent” as a ballot label. It is astounding to think that it would be illegal in any state for an independent candidate to have “independent” as a ballot label. The authoritarianism of New York state, the only state with only two presidential candidates on the ballot last November, is shocking.