On December 28, the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled unanimously that declared write-in presidential candidates must submit the name of a proposed vice-presidential running mate. Carlson v Simon, A16-1533. Here is the 12-page decision, which says, in essence, presidential candidates who qualify to have their names printed on the November ballot must have a running mate, so it is not unfair to require declared write-in presidential candidates to also have a running mate.
The case was filed by Steve Carlson, whose presidential campaign was so insubstantial, he was not on the ballot in any state and he did not file as a declared write-in presidential candidate in any state except Minnesota. It is ironic that anyone sued Minnesota over its write-in presidential procedures, because Minnesota has one of the most permissive such laws in the nation. Write-in presidential candidates need not file until seven days before the election, and they only need one presidential elector candidate. Minnesota is so easy, there were 24 declared write-in presidential candidates, and Minnesota tallied the votes for each of them, except that Carlson received no tally because he didn’t submit a v-p candidate.
States that ought to be sued by declared presidential write-in candidates are the ones that won’t tally the votes of such candidates: Alaska, D.C., Nebraska, North Dakota, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming. Thanks to Jim Ivey for the link.