California Lawsuit by Rocky De La Fuente and American Independent Party Finally Gets Filed

On December 16, the state court lawsuit in California by Rocky De La Fuente and the American Independent Party finally was filed. De La Fuente v Padilla, Sacramento Superior Court, 34-2016-002-04821-GDS.

The case had been filed on December 9, but there was a technical glitch with the filing. See here for an explanation of the issues. The lawsuit complains about various violations of the election law relative to De La Fuente (who was denied write-in status in California) and about the presidential ballot.

California Certificate of Ascertainment Says 108 Presidential Elector Candidates Pledged to Donald Trump Each Received 4,483,810

A “certificate of ascertainment” is a document filed by each jurisdiction that elects presidential electors. Under Title 3, section 6, of the U.S. Code, these documents must be signed by the Governor and filed with the National Archives. Here is California’s certificate, signed by Governor Jerry Brown.

California’s certificate is inaccurate on its face. It claims that the 55 Republican electors each received 4,483,810 popular votes. It also claims that the 55 American Independent Party electors, who are almost entirely different individuals, also received 4,483,810 votes. That means that 108 Trump electors each received 4,483,810 votes, even though California is only entitled to 55 electoral votes.

Two individuals were on both the Republican list and the American Independent Party list.

A more honest certificate of ascertainment would have said that it is impossible to know how many popular votes each of the presidential elector received, because voters who voted for Trump in California were forced to vote for 108 presidential electors, instead of 55. If Trump had received the most popular votes in California, there would be no way to know which of his 108 elector candidates had been elected. The mainstream press in California has ignored this event, even though it is believed that no state has ever before blundered in this way.

The Secretary of State of California first accepted the 55 AIP candidates, and then he also accepted the additional 53 Republican candidates. He should have told the American Independent and Republican Parties that he would not accept their lists unless the two parties agreed on a common slate of 55 Trump electors. If they had then refused, he should have printed two spaces on the ballot for Trump, so that any voter could choose whether to vote for the Republican slate or the AIP slate.

News Footage of Colorado Electoral College Voting

The film footage at the top of this news story shows the initial results when the Colorado electors met. The presiding officer says that eight votes have been cast for Hillary Clinton, and one invalid vote has been cast that cannot be counted. The presiding officer then asks for volunteers to replace the one elector who did not vote for Clinton. Some members of the audience then are heard objecting to the ruling.

Washington Secretary of State Says She Will Fine the Four “Disobedient” Presidential Electors

See this story about the electoral college vote in Olympia, Washington. It says the Secretary of State plans to enforce a $1,000 fine against each of the four. This is actually good news for those who believe the courts should settle the question of whether duly-elector presidential electors can be punished for voting for someone other than expected. It guarantees that their pending lawsuit won’t be deemed moot. Thanks to Eric Garris for the link.