Ten Presidential Electors Request Briefing from National Intelligence Director Before College Meets on December 19

Nine Democratic presidential electors, and one Republican presidential elector, have signed a letter to the Director of National Intelligence, asking for a briefing before the electoral college meets on December 19. See this story, which has a link to the letter itself. The letter also has a link by which other electors may add their names to the letter. The electors say they need to review evidence that Russia manipulated the U.S. election campaign. Thanks to Political Wire for the link, which is at Politico.

Hopeful Clue in Arkansas Ballot Access Case on Independent Petition Deadline

The Eighth Circuit will hear Moore v Martin, 15-3558, on Wednesday, December 14, in St. Louis. The hearing is in the Federal Courthouse, 28th floor, at 9 a.m. The issue is the non-presidential independent petition deadline that was in effect in 2014 (when the case was filed) and again in 2018. That deadline is in the first week of March. In August 2015 the U.S. District Court had upheld that deadline.

On December 6, 2016, the panel of the Eighth Circuit judges who are hearing the appeal asked attorneys for both sides to please provide a copy of an unreported court decision from 1976, Lendall v Jernigan. That decision struck down the Arkansas non-presidential independent deadline of April. That 1976 decision was before a 3-judge court. Decisions of three-judge courts are entitled to get a response from the U.S. Supreme Court. In the 1976 Lendall case, after Arkansas lost in the 3-judge court, it appealed to the the U.S. Supreme Court, and in 1977 the U.S. Supreme Court summarily affirmed the decision striking down the April deadline.

Summary affirmances are binding, if the issue is precisely the same. After Arkansas lost the 1976 case, it had changed the deadline to May. But then in 1987 the legislature had forgotten why it had moved the deadline to May, and moved the deadline to January. In 1988 a new lawsuit was filed against the January deadline, and the U.S. District Court struck down the January deadline, pointing out that if the U.S. Supreme Court had already summarily struck down an April deadline for Arkansas, obviously a January deadline is too early.

In response to losing the 1988 case, the state moved the deadline back to May, but in 2013 it again forgot why it had done that, and moved the deadline to March. It is a very hopeful sign that the Eighth Circuit panel wants to see the original 1976 decision. On December 12 the attorney for the plaintiff-candidate furnished a copy of the decision to the panel.

Seventh Circuit Allows Illinois Ballot Access Case to Proceed

On December 6, the Seventh Circuit issued a favorable procedural ruling in Gill v Scholz, the case over the 5% petition requirement for independent candidates, and the nominees of unqualified parties, for U.S. House. The state had tried to persuade the Seventh Circuit to terminate the case in the U.S. District Court, but the Seventh Circuit declined to do that.

The case now is before the U.S. District Court for a decision as to whether the 5% petition requirement, combined with the 90-day petitioning period, is too severe. It is fairly likely that the U.S. District Court Judge will grant declaratory relief, because on August 25, 2016, she had enjoined the law and said it is probably unconstitutional. Afterwards the Seventh Circuit had blocked the plaintiff-candidate, David Gill, from being put on the ballot, but said nothing about the merits of the issue.

California Presidential Elector Files Lawsuit to Void California Law that Tells Presidential Electors to Vote for the Nominee of their Party

On Friday, December 9, a California presidential elector, Vinz Keller, filed a federal lawsuit to overturn the California law that tells presidential electors to vote in the electoral college for the nominee of their party. Keller v Brown, n.d., 5:16cv-7069.

Keller is a Democrat and he does not assert that he is certain to vote for someone other than Hillary Clinton. He says he is undecided and wants the freedom to work with other presidential electors. Thanks to Politico for this news.

Here is his Complaint. The case has not yet been assigned to a particular judge.