North Carolina law says the 2016 presidential primary should be in February, which is in violation of national party rules for both major parties. The bill to move that primary to March 15, 2016, is HB 373. HB 373 was originally a bill that had no connection to the presidential primary, and it had passed the House. In July the Senate transformed the bill into a presidential primary date bill, and passed it in its new form. But since then, it has made no headway in the House. North Carolina is the only state with its presidential primary date still unsettled. If the state doesn’t move the presidential primary into March, Republican rules will bar most of the state’s delegates from being seated.

TIME Magazine has an interview with Donald Trump which can be seen at this link. About 90% of the way down, he said, “I think Bernie Sanders should run on the Green Party.” The same paragraph also includes his statement that so far, the Republican Party is treating him very fairly.

On August 19, the Independent Voters Network and California Forward held an all-day meeting in Sacramento on the top-two system. The meeting opened with a short address by California Secretary of State Alex Padilla. He gave a brief autobiography, and then talked about his recent decision to let a certain group of ex-felons register to vote. He discussed his hope that the legislature would pass the bill automatically registering every adult citizen known to state government, and mentioned the Colorado and Oregon experience with this idea. He did not discuss top-two and he did not take questions.

That was followed by a panel of four individuals: Political Science Professors Andrew Sinclair and Kimberly Nalder, Assemblymember Brian Maienschein (R-San Diego), and attorney Chad Peace, son of former California State Senator Steve Peace. Sinclair said there are trade-offs to the top-two system. He said members of the weaker major party now have more power to influence the identity of the strong major party candidate, but on the other hand the system hurts minor parties. Nalder said some voters in the weaker major party want to express support for their own party in the general election and they are unsatisfied with a choice between two members of the stronger major party. She also said that the system hurts minor party voters. She also mentioned that since top-two began, the number of women legislators in California has declined (the number is now lower than at any time since the 2001-2002 session); and she mentioned that since top-two started, California turnout has declined.

Maienschein said the legislators work together better since top-two began. Sinclair said that cause-and-effect is difficult to determine because California made so many changes to its election system almost simultaneously (ending the two-thirds rule for the budget, redistricting reform, term limits reform). Peace gave an interesting and objective account of how the top-two system came into existence in California. He also noted that there are now more African-Americans in the legislature than before. Sinclair said that research shows that many voters are uninformed about the ideology of candidates for partisan office, although in one particular Assembly district he studied in 2012, the voters were informed about the ideology of the leading candidates.

During the question period, Paula Lee, an activist in Californians for Electoral Reform, which advocates alternate voting systems such as proportional representation, suggested an end to single-member districts. Former State Senator Steve Peace then appeared at the podium and said he now supports converting the California system to a top-three system in which Instant Runoff Voting would be used in the general election. This is a significant development, because Peace is influential and has been one of the founders of the top-two system in California.