U.S. District Court Judge Denies Injunctive Relief in Rocky De La Fuente Lawsuit Against California Independent Presidential Petition

On August 12, U.S. District Court Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald, an Obama appointee, refused injunctive relief to Rocky De La Fuente, who had sued California over the requirement that he submit 178,039 signatures by August 12 to be on the ballot. De La Fuente v Padilla, 2:16cv-3242. The requirement equals 1% of the number of registered voters.

The order says the Ninth Circuit already upheld Hawaii’s independent presidential petition in Nader v Cronin, 620 F 3d 1214. Hawaii required an independent presidential candidate to submit the signatures of 1% of the last presidential vote, due 60 days before the general election. The Hawaii requirement at the time was 3,711 signatures, due September 3. The order says, “The Court discerns no meaningful difference between the 1% requirement in Nader as compared to the 1% requirement in this case.”

An assertion that obtaining 3,711 signatures in Hawaii is no different than obtaining 178,039 signatures in California seems obviously untrue.

The judge ignored the evidence that no one has completed the California independent petition since 1992. The U.S. Supreme Court has said several times that one way to evaluate a petition requirement is to see how often it has been used.

The lawsuit is not over, and a decision on declaratory relief will be obtained in the future.

Hutchinson News Carries Op-Ed on Debate Exclusion Affecting Kansas U.S. House Independent

Greg Orman has this op-ed in the Hutchinson News, about the decision of Kansas TV station WIBW to exclude independent candidate Alan LaPolice from its upcoming debate. LaPolice is the first person to have qualified for a U.S. House seat as an independent candidate since 1984. He has substantial voter support, as Orman demonstrates. Yet WIBW won’t allow him into its U.S. House debate.

U.S. District Court Judge Corrects One of her Errors in Debates Decision

On August 15, U.S. District Court Judge Rosemary Collyer revised her opinion in Johnson v Commission on Presidential Debates, 1:15cv-1580. Her original decision of August 5 had said that the Obama and Romney campaigns in 2012 had set the 15% polling threshold. The revised opinion says that the Commission on Presidential Debates set that rule and that the Obama and Romney campaigns had agreed to it.

She has not corrected her other factual errors: she omitted Ralph Nader from the list of presidential candidates who were on the ballot in states with a majority of the electoral college in 2004 yet polled under 1%; and she still lists Virgil Goode in 2012 as having been one of those candidates, when in fact he was not on the ballot in states containing a majority of the electoral college.

Constitution Party Has Enough Valid Signatures in West Virginia

On August 15, the West Virginia Secretary of State determined that the Constitution Party has enough valid signatures on its statewide petition. The petition includes nominees for President and Governor. No other statewide petition was submitted in West Virginia this year. The four qualified parties are Democratic, Green, Libertarian, and Republican. Thanks to Jeff Becker for this news.