Florida Supreme Court Orders Legislature to Redraw U.S. House Districts

On July 9, the Florida Supreme Court issued an opinion in League of Women Voters of Florida v Detzner, SC14-1905. The order says the state’s U.S. House district boundaries for eight districts violate the State Constitution. The order says the legislature must quickly redraw the boundaries of these eight districts:

5, Corrine Brown
13, David W. Jolly
14, Kathy Castor
21, Theodore E. Deutch
22, Lois Frankel
25, Mario Diaz-Balart
26, Carlos Curbelo
27, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen

Of course, new boundaries for this districts will mean new boundaries for next-door districts, so probably a majority of the 27 districts will need new boundaries. The vote was 5-2. The State Constitution says that the legislature must not be influenced by considerations of partisanship. The State Supreme Court found that the Republican majority in the legislature had violated that provision of the State Constitution. The lower state court had also invalidated the plan, but the lower court had only ruled that two particular districts needed to be redrawn.

Green and Constitution Parties Will Ask U.S. District Court to Clarify Whether They are on Tennessee Ballot for 2016

The Green Party and the Constitution Party are about to file a motion for clarification with a U.S. District Court in Tennessee, to determine if they are still on the ballot for 2016. As previously noted, on July 2 the Sixth Circuit agreed with last year’s U.S. District Court decision that Tennessee’s law on how a party remains on the ballot is unconstitutional. The Tennessee legislature is not in session, so the existing law can’t be repaired until the 2016 session of the legislature.

National Journal Analysis Shows Why Republican Party Can’t Legally Bar Donald Trump from Debates

A few Republican Party leaders have expressed the idea that somehow, the party should keep Donald Trump out of its upcoming presidential debates. This National Journal article explains that federal campaign finance laws do not permit that. Debate sponsors must use objective criteria, such as poll results, not political criteria. Thanks to the Center for Competitive Politics for the link.

Donald Trump Says Many People Ask if He Would Run Outside the Two Major Parties

This news story says Donald Trump was asked whether he would run for president outside the major parties. He said “no”, but not in an absolute sense.

Also, see this story. Trump’s comment that everyone who voted for Ross Perot in 1992 would have voted for George H. W. Bush if Perot had not been running is contradicted by 1992 exit polls. Those exit polls showed half of Perot’s voters would have voted for Bill Clinton if Perot had not been running, and the other half said they would vote for President Bush. Of course some of them would have voted for another candidate.

On a related note, this Public Policy Poll released on July 8 for the North Carolina Republican primary says Trump is leading. Thanks to PolitialWire for the link.

Will Leitch Condemns Debate Exclusion Based on Poll Results

Will Leitch, an author and blogger who is more noted for his writing on sports, here comments on the Fox News rules for the August 6, 2015 Republican presidential debate. His piece is on Bloomberg Politics. Leitch writes, “Allowing pollsters and television networks to choose who gets to be a candidate long before any actual voter gets to see them is profoundly undemocratic in the purest way.”