Minnesota Republican Party Files Alternate Presidential Election Candidates Timely, but Broke its Own Bylaws in the Process

Minnesota election law requires qualified parties to file their presidential elector candidates, and an equal number of alternates, by August 29. The Republican Party has complied with this law. However, when it first nominated presidential elector candidates earlier this year, it forgot it was supposed to also nominate alternates. See this story.

When the party realized this, it called a meeting of the state committee, nominated alternates, and forwarded them to the Secretary of State by the legal deadline. However, the meeting that was called to choose alternates was in violation of the party bylaws, which say a 10-day notice is required for meetings. The party ignored that bylaw because of the time emergency. Thanks to Jeff Becker for the link.

Three Ballot-Qualified Parties in Oregon Likely to Skip Presidential Election

Oregon has eight qualified parties. It is likely that three of them won’t nominate anyone for President.

The Working Families Party generally nominates candidates who are also Democratic nominees, but the Working Families Party in Oregon does not expect to nominate Hillary Clinton or anyone else.

The Constitution Party of Oregon is in political disagreement with the national Constitution Party, and does not expect to nominate Darrell Castle or anyone else for President this year.

The Independent Party had its own private presidential primary, and no one got as much as 50%, so under its own bylaws, it can’t nominate anyone for President.

The other five parties are Democratic, Green, Libertarian, Progressive, and Republican. The Progressive Party nominated Jill Stein, so her name will be on the ballot as “Pacific Green, Progressive.”

U.S. District Court Enjoins Illinois 5% Petition Requirement for Candidates for U.S. House who Make a Substantial Effort

On August 25, U.S. District Court Judge Sue Myerscough, an Obama appointee, enjoined the Illinois petition requirement for independent candidates, and the nominees of unqualified parties, for U.S. House, at least as applied to candidates who make a very substantial effort. The 26-page decision puts David Gill on the ballot. He is an independent candidate in the 13th district. He submitted over 11,000 signatures to meet a requirement of 10,754, but was found to have 8,593 valid.

The opinion relies on the historical record showing it is extremely rare for any petitioning candidate for U.S. House to ever overcome a petition requirement greater than 10,754. UPDATE: here is the most comprehensive newspaper story about the decision, in the State Journal-Register, the Springfield daily newspaper.

Rocky De La Fuente Sues South Dakota over Petition Validity

On August 24, Rocky De La Fuente filed a federal lawsuit against the South Dakota Secretary of State, over whether his independent presidential petition has enough valid signatures. The state said only 57% of his signatures are valid, which is unusually low in South Dakota, which has a high rate of voter registration.

The state did not check all the signatures; it relied on a random sample. The case is De La Fuente v Krebs, 3:16cv-3035. It is assigned to Judge Roberto Lange, an Obama appointee. The judge has already set a hearing date, Tuesday, August 30, at 1 p.m.

Michigan Court of Claims Keeps Marijuana Initiative off Ballot; Proponents Will Appeal

On August 23, the Michigan Court of Claims ruled that a statewide initiative for marijuana legalization cannot qualify for the ballot, even though it almost certainly has enough valid signatures. Not all of the signatures were collected inside the 180-day window. See this story.

The Michigan Court of Claims is a branch of the state Appeals Court. Proponents of the initiative will appeal to the State Supreme Court. Thanks to Thomas Jones for the link.