On March 17, California held an election to fill three vacant State Senate seats.  In the 37th district, in Orange County, three Republicans were on the ballot, and the ballot had write-in space.  Even though this was the only office on the ballot, more than 1,200 voters cast an “undervote”.  In other words, they did not vote for any of the three candidates on the ballot, nor did they vote for the only declared write-in candidate in the race, Democrat Louise Stewardson.

The Orange County Registrar of Voters, in this interview, was asked why a voter would go to all the trouble to vote in an election with only one race on the ballot, and not vote for any of the official candidates.  The response is that most of these voters wanted to vote for a Democrat, but they didn’t know the name of the only declared write-in Democratic candidate.  Probably most of these undervotes are from voters who cast a write-in for someone who wasn’t a declared write-in candidate.

So far, the election returns for this race are:  Republican John Moorlach 36,393; Republican Donald Wagner 31,870; Republican Naz Namazi 2,490.  There is no tally yet for the number of write-ins for Louise Stewardson.  Until the Stewardson write-in total is known, it is difficult to predict if Moorlach got as many as 50% of the total valid votes cast.  If he didn’t, there will be a run-off.  Thanks to AroundtheCapitol for the link.

The Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives has just published “Statistics of the Congressional Election of November 4, 2014”.  See it here

The charts in the back show the national vote for US House by party, and .for US Senate by party.  The Clerk has been publishing a similar book for each congressional election starting in 1920.

The 2014 book does a better job than the books published for earlier elections.  In the recent past, the charts in the back discriminated against minor parties and for major parties.  Past copies of the book listed all Democratic nominees in the “Democratic” column in the charts, whether the Democratic Party had a different name on the ballot in a particular state or not.  In Minnesota, Democrats are on the general election ballot as “Democratic-Farmer-Labor.”  In North Dakota, Democrats are on as “Democratic-Non-Partisan.”  But the chart showing the national Democratic vote always included Democratic nominees from those two states.

However, past books did not put Green Party nominees in the “Green” column in the charts, if the Green Party had a different name in a particular state or jurisdiction.  Past books put the Green nominees in Maine, West Virginia, Massachusetts, Oregon, and the District of Columbia, in the “other parties” column instead of the “Green” column, because the name of the Green Party in those five places is different than just “Green.”

On October 6, 2014, the Green Party informed the Clerk of the U.S. House that its name in D.C. is “Statehood Green”; in Maine, “Green Independent”; in Massachusetts, “Green-Rainbow”; in Oregon, “Pacific Green”; and in West Virginia, “Mountain Party.”  Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi helped see that the Clerk was cognizant of this letter, and the Clerk then prepared the 2014 book listing all the Green Party votes in the Green Party column.  Thanks to Thomas Jones for the link to the book.

On March 18, CNN/ORC released a poll which includes questions about how voters would vote for President in November 2016.  Scroll down to question 22.  Assuming Hillary Clinton is the Democratic nominee, she beats most potential Republican nominees by at least 12 points, and in many cases 15 points.  Thanks to Political Wire for the link.