Utah Democratic Party Asks to Intervene in Utah Republican Party Lawsuit on Primaries

On January 26, the Utah Democratic Party asked a U.S. District Court for permission to intervene in the lawsuit Utah Republican Party v Herbert, 2:16cv-38. The Republican Party lawsuit, filed on January 15, 2016, argues that the number of signatures for a candidate to get on a primary ballot is unconstitutional, at least as applied to the Republican Party, because only registered Republicans can sign primary petitions and there just aren’t enough registered Republicans to sign. In some legislative districts, over 50% of the registered Republicans would need to sign.

The Democratic Party argues that this is the Republican Party’s own fault, caused by the party’s winning an earlier case that said the party has a right to confine signatures on primary petitions to members of the party. The Democratic Party also says the current Republican case should be dismissed on the grounds that the Republican Party should have raised that point in its first election law case, the one filed in 2014. Finally the Democratic Party says it wouldn’t be fair to lower the number of signatures on primary petitions for just the Republican Party.

U.S. District Court Enjoins Connecticut’s Ban on Out-of-State Circulators

On January 27, U.S. District Court Judge Janet C. Hall enjoined Connecticut’s ban on out-of-state circulators. Libertarian Party of Connecticut v Merrill, 15-cv-1851. The 17-page opinion says “the Party is substantially likely to succeed on the merits of a facial challenge to the statutues at issue”, so even though a final decision on constitutionality has not been issued yet, in the meantime anyone from outside Connecticut may work, and the signatures cannot be invalidated just because the circulator is not a Connecticut resident.

The ACLU handled this case. UPDATE: here is a news story.

January 2016 Ballot Access News Print Edition

Ballot Access News
January 1, 2016 – Volume 31, Number 8

This issue was printed on pink paper.


Table of Contents

  1. MICHIGAN LEGISLATURE REPEALS STRAIGHT-TICKET DEVICE
  2. COURT SEEMS TO CRITICIZE CALIFORNIA BALLOT LABEL LAW
  3. MAINE REJECTS LIBERTARIAN BALLOT ACCESS; PARTY TO SUE
  4. VIRGINIA BALLOT ACCESS BILL
  5. U.S. SUPREME COURT ELECTION LAW RULING
  6. DEBATES LAWSUITS
  7. TEXAS MINOR PARTIES THREATENED
  8. HISTORY OF CHANGES MAKING IT EASIER FOR A PARTY TO REMAIN ON BALLOT
  9. PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY CANDIDATES WHO GOT ON BALLOTS IN DECEMBER
  10. 2016 PETITIONING FOR PRESIDENT
  11. MINOR PARTIES IN STATE ELECTIONS, NOVEMBER 2015
  12. GREEN PARTY SETS CONVENTION AFTER DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION
  13. WORKING FAMILIES PARTY WON PARTISAN ELECTION IN NOVEMBER
  14. PROHIBITION PARTY NOW QUALIFIED IN MISSISSIPPI
  15. SUBSCRIBING TO BAN WITH PAYPAL

Illinois Primary Ballots Must be Printed Before Petition Challenges to Presidential Candidates are Resolved

According to this story, many challenges to mainstream major party presidential candidates will not be resolved by the time Illinois must print ballots for the primary.

Illinois could save itself this headache if it abolished mandatory primary petitions, which a majority of states have done.