November 2015 Ballot Access News Print Edition

Ballot Access News
November 1, 2015 – Volume 31, Number 6

This issue was printed on purple paper.


Table of Contents

  1. TOP-TWO PRIMARY SYSTEM LOSES SUPPORT
  2. MAINE INSTANT RUNOFF VOTING
  3. NEW CANADA GOVERNMENT PLEDGED TO ELECTION REFORM
  4. LARRY LESSIG ASKS NBC FOR EQUAL TIME
  5. SUPREME COURT WON’T HEAR PRIMARY CASES
  6. ACLU SUES CALIFORNIA OVER DISCRIMINATORY LAW ON PARTY LABELS
  7. NEW MEXICO SECRETARY OF STATE WON’T LET PETITIONS CIRCULATE NOW
  8. CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE REFUSES TO TALLY INDEPENDENT PARTY REGISTRATIONS
  9. LAWSUIT NEWS
  10. BALLOT ACCESS FOR 2016 REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARIES
  11. 2016 PETITIONING FOR PRESIDENT
  12. GALLUP POLLING DECISION AND PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES
  13. EMMA MAR, FIRST ASIAN TO APPEAR ON A BALLOT FOR NATIONAL OFFICE, DIES
  14. JIM WEBB MAY RUN AS AN INDEPENDENT FOR PRESIDENT
  15. LOUISIANA’S TWO INDEPENDENT LEGISLATORS ARE RE-ELECTED
  16. SOCIALIST PARTY NOMINATES
  17. PROHIBITION PARTY ON IN ARKANSAS
  18. SUBSCRIBING TO BAN WITH PAYPAL

Martin O’Malley and Jill Stein Likely to be the Only Presidential Candidates Who Will Receive Public Funding in January 2016

Presidential candidates are free to be raising money now so as to qualify for primary season matching funds. However, the FEC won’t release any such funds until January 4, 2016. It seems likely that in January, two presidential candidates will start receiving the funds. Martin O’Malley has already raised total contributions of $3,234,569, according to his September 30, 2015 campaign finance report, so it seems inevitable he has raised at least $5,000 in each of 20 states, in small amounts (only $250 per donor counts).

Jill Stein also expects to qualify by January 4, 2016. Her campaign has updated the chart on her webpage that shows her progress. See it here.

Of course, many other Republican presidential candidates, as well as Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, have also received enough donations to qualify, but they don’t want to accept primary season matching funds, partly because the money comes with strings, relating to how much can be spent in any particular state. Larry Lessig had received enough donations to qualify, but he has withdrawn from the Democratic race.

Republican Party of Louisiana Wins a Procedural Victory in Campaign Finance Case

On November 25, U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper, an Obama appointee, ruled that the Louisiana Republican Party’s challenge to part of the McCain-Feingold law is entitled to be heard by a 3-judge court. Here is the 19-page opinion in Republican Party of Louisiana v Federal Election Commission.

Very few constitutional lawsuits are entitled to be heard by a three-judge U.S. District Court. In election law, the only types of case entitled to a 3-judge U.S. District Court are redistricting constitutional cases, and challenges to the McCain-Feingold law of 2002. The reason 3-judge cases are so powerful for plaintiffs is that after the 3-judge court makes its ruling, then the losing side is guaranteed the ability to receive U.S. Supreme Court review. The U.S. Supreme Court must either summarily affirm the lower court ruling, or give the case a full hearing and a full opinion.

The Louisiana Republican Party is trying to strike down the part of the McCain-Feingold law that won’t let state and local parties engage in any type of federal campaign activity, except through segregated federal accounts. State and local parties have severe restrictions on raising money for their federal campaign accounts, due to federal law. If parties could spend money on federal campaign activity out of their ordinary bank accounts, they would be much freer. The Louisiana Republican Party only wants to make independent expenditures in federal campaigns, not direct contributions to federal candidates. Thanks to Rick Hasen for this news. A win by the Louisiana Republican Party would be a very meaningful victory for all state and local political parties, including minor parties.