Ohio Libertarian Party Asks Sixth Circuit to Invalidate Ballot Access Law

On November 19, the Ohio Libertarian Party filed a notice of appeal to the Sixth Circuit, in Libertarian Party of Ohio v Husted, 14-3230. The issue in this part of the case is whether Ohio waived its Eleventh Amendment immunity. If Ohio did waive its Eleventh Amendment immunity, then the federal courts have a right to determine if the 2013 ballot access laws for new political parties violates the Ohio Constitution. The U.S. District Court had ruled that federal courts can’t decide whether the 2013 law violates the Ohio Constitution.

The 2013 law appears to violate the Ohio Constitution, because the 2013 law says new parties can’t nominate by primary, yet the State Constitution seems to say all parties must nominate by primary. The 2013 law sets a July petition deadline for new parties, and the Ohio primary is already over by then. The Ohio primary is in March in presidential years and May in other years.

In the meantime, the party is still waiting for the U.S. District Court to rule on whether the enforcement of another law in 2014 represented selective enforcement. That law required petitioners to fill in a blank to say who paid them to gather signatures. The law had never before been enforced. It was also ambiguous, because it wasn’t clear to the circulators that it applied to independent contractors.

Two Illinois Libertarian Candidates Sue to Overturn Illinois Campaign Finance Restriction

On November 19, two Libertarian candidates for Illinois state office in 2016 filed a lawsuit against a 2013 law that makes it illegal for a medical cannabis business, or a PAC formed by such a business, to contribute any money to any candidate for state office. The case is Ball v Madigan, 1:15cv-10441, n.d.. The case is assigned to U.S. District Judge John Z. Lee, an Obama appointee.

The plaintiffs are Claire Ball, running for Controller, and Scott Schluter, for legislature. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.