U.S. District Court Judge Hints that Utah’s Primary Election Law is Unconstitutional

On Tuesday, October 27, oral arguments were held in U.S. District Court in Utah, in the Republican-Constitution Party lawsuit against the law on how parties nominate candidates. The judge said he is inclined to find the law unconstitutional. See this story. It is not clear which provision is in greater jeopardy. The two challenged procedures are: (1) forcing parties to let candidates on their primary ballot who have little support at a party caucus; (2) forcing parties to let independent voters vote in their primaries. The law says parties that don’t allow these things can still run nominees, but the nominees must petition to be on the November ballot in the same manner as independent candidates. Utah only requires 1,000 signatures for statewide independent candidates and smaller numbers of signatures for other office.

Alabama Secretary of State Acknowledges that Constitution Party is Ballot-Qualified in Marshall County

Alabama law requires a party to poll 20% of the vote for any office, in order to be on the ballot automatically, without submitting a petition. In November 2014, the Constitution Party polled over 20% of the vote for a partisan countywide office in Marshall County. The Secretary of State has acknowledged that the party is on the ballot (for county office only) in Marshall County in 2016, and has sent the party the voter registration rolls for the county. The party has the right to decide for itself whether it will nominate by convention or primary. It will probably choose a convention.

Marshall County has over 40,000 registered voters and is in northern Alabama. Thanks to Joshua Cassity for this news.

Under a U.S. Supreme Court precedent from 1970, Rockefeller v Socialist Workers Party, 400 U.S. 806, if the government gives a free list of the registered voters to a qualified party, it must also give the same list free to an unqualified party that is attempting to petition its way onto the ballot.

Mediation Fails in Utah Lawsuit over Primaries

According to this story, the lawsuit filed in 2014 by the Utah Republican Party and the Utah Constitution Party will not be settled by mediation. The case is Utah Republican Party v Governor Gary Herbert, 2:14cv-876. The issues are the law that (1) requires parties to put candidates on their primary ballots even if those candidates have no support at party caucuses; require parties to let independent voters vote in their primaries. The law says parties are free to ignore both requirements, but if they do, they won’t be considered ballot-qualified and will need to put their nominees on the November ballot via independent candidate petition procedures.

Seattle Voters Will Vote Next Month on Public Funding of Campaigns for City Office

On November 3, Seattle voters will decide whether to pass measure I-122. It would set up public funding for candidates for city office. All Seattle city office elections are non-partisan. See this story.

If the measure passes, all registered voters would be sent four vouchers, each good for $25. Recipients of the vouchers could then send them to any candidate for city office favored by that recipient. This eliminates one objection to other public funding measures. Opponents of standard public funding measures say it is wrong to force anyone to support a candidate he or she doesn’t like, but that objection is not present in a voucher system. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.

The Daily Northwestern Carries Op-Ed in Support of Proportional Representation for U.S.

The Daily Northwestern, a daily newspaper published by students at Northwestern University, has this op-ed advocating that the U.S. use proportional representation for congressional elections. The paper is considered one of the best student newspapers in the nation, and it also serves as the only daily newspaper for Evanston, Illinois.

The author only presents one type of proportional representation. Also he says constitutions would need to be changed. It may be true that some state constitutions would need amendments, but nothing in the U.S. Constitution blocks proportional representation for Congress. States are free, under the Constitution, to elect members of Congress any way they wish, as long as they are chosen by popular vote. However, a federal law mandating single-member U.S. House districts would need to be changed. A bill will be introduced in Congress to repeal that law.