Orange County, North Carolina, Republicans Actively Petitioning for an Independent Candidate

The Orange County, North Carolina, Republican Party is actively working on the petition drive of an independent candidate for Register of Deeds for the county. North Carolina has very stringent requirements for independent candidates, and independent candidates for partisan county office need 4% of the registered voters.

The independent candidate, Gayle Chaney, needs 4,300 valid signatures by noon, June 27, Friday. Although independent candidates for multi-county office are due June 12, petitions submitted to counties have an additional fifteen days. Chaney is a registered Republican, but North Carolina, like most states, does not bar individuals from being independent candidates, even if they are members of a party.

No Republican had filed to run in the Republican primary for Register of Deeds. But in the Democratic primary, held May 6, the incumbent Democratic Register of Deeds was narrowly defeated by another Democrat who promises to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. If the Republicans had known this would happen in the Democratic primary, they would have run someone. The petition drive is being handled out of the county Republican headquarters. Thanks to Jordon Greene for this link to the web page of the North Carolina Values Coalition.

Bipartisan Policy Center Recommends that All States Hold Congressional Primaries in June

On June 24, the Bipartisan Policy Center issued a report, “Governing in a Polarized America: A Bipartisan Blueprint to Strengthen Our Democracy.” One surprising recommendation is that all states hold congressional primaries on the same day in June. The Report does not discuss why June was chosen. Currently, congressional primaries are held over a six month range, from March through September.

The Report does not say whether it believes Congress should legislate a uniform primary date, or whether the states should simply be asked to agree. Bills in Congress to regulate the dates of presidential primaries have been introduced starting in the 1980’s, but none has ever come close to passing. It seems unlikely Congress would ever pass a bill to regulate the date of congressional primaries.

The Report is vague about what type of primaries are best, and simply concludes that primary turnout should be encouraged.

Portland, Maine Press Herald Compares Instant Runoff Voting with Top-Two Primaries

The Press Herald of Portland, Maine, has this editorial comparing Instant Runoff Voting and Top-Two Primaries. The editorial prefers Instant Runoff Voting. It says, about top-two systems, “Five months before the election, most voters haven’t tuned in yet and won’t have had the benefit of hearing candidates’ messages honed over long campaigns.” This is an apt criticism, and supporters of top-two generally don’t have a response to this point.

Unfortunately, the editorial writers are not aware that the term “open primary” does not mean a top-two primary. “Open primary” was the name given to the primary system Wisconsin invented in 1907, in which there is no registration by party. Every party has its own primary ballot, but any voter is free to choose any party’s primary ballot. The U.S. Supreme Court has issued several opinions which define the various types of primary, and the U.S. Supreme Court uses the traditional definition; so do political science textbooks. Notwithstanding that, journalists all across the country use “open primary” in wildly different ways. Pennsylvania journalists use “open primary” to mean a closed partisan primary in which the party organization hasn’t made any endorsements. Illinois journalists use “open primary” to mean a secret open primary (in which the primary voter chooses a party primary ballot in the secrecy of the voting booth). British journalists use “open primary” to mean a primary administered and paid for by a party, in which any voter may participate.

U.S. District Court in Arizona Declines to Enjoin County Distribution Requirement for Primary Petitions

On June 23, U.S. District Court Judge Neil Wake declined to enjoin Arizona’s county distribution requirement for petitions to place statewide candidates on the primary ballot. Arizona law requires signatures of one-half of 1% of the registered members of a party to sign statewide primary petitions. In addition, the one-half of 1% standard must be met in at least three counties. The plaintiffs had challenged the requirement that the threshold be met in three counties.

The five-page order says nothing about the validity of the law, but says that the plaintiffs should have filed the lawsuit earlier. Plaintiffs had admitted that they started thinking about filing the lawsuit in December 2013, but did not actually file it until May 15, 2014. The case is Arizona Public Integrity Alliance v Bennett, 2:14cv-1044.

Number of North Dakota Voters Choosing Libertarian Primary Ballot Triples Compared to Last Mid-Term Primary

All ballot-qualified parties in North Dakota nominate by primary. The primary is open. On primary day, all voters are free to choose any party’s primary ballot. The only ballot-qualified parties in North Dakota in 2010, and also in 2014, were the Republican, Democratic, and Libertarian Parties.

Although it is not possible to know the exact number of voters who choose any party’s primary, it is possible to know this approximately, by looking at the primary election returns. In the June 2010 primary, the largest vote total received by any Republican candidate was 65,205 votes; the largest vote total for any Democrat was 28,404 votes; the largest for any Libertarian was 548 votes.

By contrast, in June 2014, the largest vote total for any Republican was 50,446; for any Democrat, 30,154; for any Libertarian, 1,555. Thus while Republican primary voters dropped 22.6%, and Democratic primary turnout stayed approximately the same, Libertarian primary participation tripled.

Parties remain qualified by polling 5% in November for certain statewide offices. The only third parties that have met the North Dakota vote test to remain ballot-qualified in the last 100 years were the Reform Party in 1996, and the Socialist Party in 1914. The Libertarian Party is optimistic that, for the first time, it will meet the 5% vote test this November. This year, the only office that counts, for which the party has a nominee, is the Secretary of State’s race. Attorney General also counts, but no Libertarian is running for that office.