September 2013 Ballot Access News Print Edition

Ballot Access News
September 1, 2013 – Volume 29, Number 4

This issue was printed on blue paper.


Table of Contents

  1. FIVE NEW PAPERS ISSUED ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRIMARY SYSTEMS AND POLARIZATION
  2. NEW MEXICO REMOVES CONSTITUTION AND GREEN PARTIES
  3. COLORADO LIBERTARIANS WIN BALLOT ACCESS CASE
  4. COLORADO REMOVES AMERICANS ELECT FROM BALLOT
  5. ELECTION BIILS SIGNED
  6. LAWSUIT NEWS
  7. 2013 PARTY REVENUE FROM STATE INCOME TAX “CHECK-OFF”
  8. TOTALS FOR THE ENTIRE NATION THROUGH HISTORY, 2000-2013
  9. CINDY SHEEHAN TO RUN FOR CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR
  10. FEC RELEASES 2012 ELECTION RETURNS
  11. SOCIALIST POLLS WELL IN SEATTLE CITY COUNCIL-AT-LARGE ELECTION
  12. LIBERTARIAN WINS A PARTISAN ELECTION BY DEFAULT
  13. DETROIT WRITE-IN CANDIDATE PLACES FIRST IN MAYORAL ELECTION
  14. NEW JERSEY ELECTIONS
  15. 2014 PETITIONING
  16. 2012 DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL NOMINEE JOINS GREEN PARTY
  17. SUBSCRIBING TO BAN WITH PAYPAL

USA Today Web Page Has Six Minute You Tube Interview with Green Party Mayor of Richmond, California

The USA Today web page has a six-minute you tube interview with Gayle McLaughlin, Mayor of Richmond, California. She is a registered member of the Green Party and she has been elected and re-elected, although the election is non-partisan. The you tube features McLaughlin talking about the city’s plan to use eminent domain to condemn Richmond homes that have mortgages substantially higher than the current value of the house.

Hawaii May Settle Pending Justice Party Lawsuit Over Petition Deadline for New Parties

Last year, the Justice Party filed a lawsuit against the Hawaii deadline for newly-qualifying parties. That deadline is in February of the election year. The case is Justice Party v Nago, U.S. District Court, 1:12cv-403. Hawaii is considering whether to re-interpret its law on independent presidential candidate ballot access so that the procedure also includes new political parties. The petition deadline for independent presidential candidates is quite late (early September of the election year).

If the Hawaii law on independent presidential candidates were interpreted to apply equally to the presidential nominees of unqualified parties, that would moot the case. The purpose of the Justice Party’s lawsuit was to get its presidential nominee on the ballot (with the party label), not nominees for other office. If Hawaii does re-interpret its law, then in future presidential elections, new or previously unqualified parties would then be able to place their presidential nominees, with the party label, on the ballot, with a petition that has a deadline in the later summer of election laws.