Newt Gingrich Recommends that South Carolina Republican Party Retain Open Primary for Itself

This article says that while Newt Gingrich was in South Carolina recently, he said that the Republican Party of South Carolina should continue to nominate by open primary. The South Carolina Republican Party is currently in court, arguing for the ability to close its primary. Also the party is thinking about nominating by convention if it can’t close its primary.

Gingrich also said that he might run for President in 2016.

Like South Carolina, Georgia and most other states in the deep south use open primaries.

Sponsor of Pennsylvania Ballot Access Bill Will Hold Town Hall Meeting to Boost the Bill

Pennsylvania State Senator Mike Folmer is hosting a Town Hall Meeting to boost SB 195, the ballot access reform bill. It will be at 6 p.m. on May 28, Tuesday, in Room 312, Neidig Garber Science Center, on the campus of Lebanon Valley College. UPDATE: the original post mistakenly said 8 p.m., but the meeting is at 6 p.m.

For more information, contact Bob Small at bobthepoet@yahoo.com.

North Carolina Ballot Access Activists Have Appointments with Six Legislators on April 30

Brian Irving is coordinating appointments between ballot access activists and North Carolina State Representatives who are on the House Elections Committee. He has appointments with six such state legislators at various times on April 30, Tuesday. Other proponents of improved ballot access will be joining him. If you live anywhere near Raleigh and you wish to help, his e-mail is brian@libertypoint.org.

Two Important U.S. Supreme Court Election Law Decisions to be Released in May or June

The U.S. Supreme Court will be releasing opinions on these dates: May 13, 20, 28; and June 3, 10, 17, and 24. These are all Mondays, except that May 28 is a Tuesday. Among the decisions will be two election law decisions.

Arizona v InterTribal Council of Arizona, 12-71, was argued March 18. The issue is whether a state can require more information on the federal voter registration postcard than the federal government itself requires.

Shelby County, Alabama v Holder, 12-96, was argued February 27. The issue is whether section five of the federal Voting Rights Act is constitutional. Section five requires certain jurisdictions to get approval from the U.S. Justice Department before changing election laws and practices. The Act has also been construed to require political parties in the covered jurisdictions to also get approval before changing bylaws that relate to nominations.

The U.S. Supreme Court accepted a third election law case on February 19, McCutcheon v FEC, 12-536. The issue is the federal law that limits an individual’s contributions to all federal candidates together to no more than $46,200 in a two-year period. The oral argument for that won’t be set until October 2013 at the earliest. The FEC’s brief is due on July 18.