ACLU Sues New Mexico Secretary of State over Public Access to Election Records

On July 20, the American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico sued New Mexico Secretary of State Diana Duran in state court. The issue is that the Secretary of State has told the press that she has found evidence that thousands of non-citizens have voted in recent New Mexico elections, but that she refuses to release this evidence. The lawsuit is based on state laws on public access to state government information. The case is ACLU of New Mexico v Duran, state district court, 2nd district, cv 2011-07257. Here is the complaint.

Arkansas Green Party gets Ready to Petition to Get Back on Ballot

The Arkansas Green Party has decided to collect signatures to get back on the ballot for 2012. The law requires the petition to be completed in 3 months. The party will seek its 10,000 valid signatures between September 3 and December 1, 2011. Meanwhile, the party is still waiting for the 8th circuit to issue an opinion in its lawsuit over the vote test for remaining on the ballot. It is conceivable that the petition won’t be needed.

Americans Elect Bylaws Suggest Hope of Electoral College Negotiations

Irregular Times has made available the Americans Elect Bylaws, which can be read here. The Bylaws are interesting for several reasons. The founders of Americans Elect have made provision for the possibility that the Americans Elect presidential nominee will receive some electoral votes, and furthermore that no presidential candidate may end up with a majority of the electoral votes. The Bylaws are careful to say that the presidential electors of American Elect will be formally unpledged, leaving them free to bargain over whom to give their electoral votes to, in case there are some Americans Elect electors and in case no presidential candidate receives a majority of the electoral vote.

The Bylaws are also interesting because they seem to place the power to nominate candidates in the hands of the Candidate Certification Committee. The bylaws say, “All qualified persons, regardless of their membership in any political party, shall be eligible to seek or accept the nomination of Americans Elect.” But they also say, “The Candidate Certification Committee shall be responsible for certifying that candidates and draftees be eligible (referring to Constitutional qualifications to hold the office), as well as to develop criteria of demonstrated achievements based on qualifications of past Presidents and Vice-Presidents to ensure that only persons capable of performing the duties of President and Vice-President are eligible for voting by the registered delegates.”

This seems to suggest that no one may seek the nomination of Americans Elect for President or Vice-President unless that person has either previously won elective office to a high position, or been a cabinet member, or been a very important general. No one has ever been elected President who did not meet one of those conditions. The bylaws say the decision of the Candidate Certification Committee can be overridden with a two-thirds vote of all delegates, but it would be virtually impossible for two-thirds of all the delegates to do anything together. There will be a large number of delegates who will probably remain passive and will not participate. Anyone U.S. adult citizen may sign up to be a delegate. Access to the contact list for the delegates will, of course, be a key asset.

U.S. District Court Sets Oral Argument in Case Against Two Particular Details of California Top-Two System

On July 14, U.S. District Court Otis Wright set an oral argument in Chamness v Bowen, cv11-01479. This is the case that challenges the part of California’s top-two system that lets some candidates use their party label on the ballot but does not let certain other candidates use their party label on the ballot. Here is the order, saying that although the judge is still inclined to uphold the ballot label law, he wants to be fair and to listen to oral argument.

On July 18, the scope of the case was potentially expanded, when a write-in candidate for U.S. House in the July 12 special election (36th district in western Los Angeles County) asked to intervene in the case. The candidate voted for himself, because the ballot contained write-in space, but his vote was not counted because the law implementing the top-two system says write-ins can never be counted in the general election for Congress and partisan state office. It will be interesting to see if the judge permits the intervention. Earlier he permitted former Lieutenant Governor Abel Maldonado to intervene in this lawsuit.

Here is commentary about the case from Damon Eris, writing at California Independent Voter Network.

Sacramento Bee Asks California Governor to Veto Bill that Outlaws Paying Circulators Per Signature

The July 20 Sacramento Bee has this editorial, asking California Governor Jerry Brown to veto SB 168. That is the bill that makes it illegal for initiative, referendum and recall petition circulators to be paid on a per-signature basis. This is a very significant editorial. The Sacramento Bee almost always endorses Democrats, not Republicans, for public office. The bill passed with unanimous opposition from Republican legislators, but only three Democratic Assemblymembers failed to vote for the bill.

The Bee editorial says what everyone knows, that the motive behind the bill is not to prevent fraud, but to make it more difficult to put initiatives on the ballot.

South Dakota Libertarian Party Gets Ready to Start Petition Drive to Get Back on Ballot

With financial help from the national Libertarian Party, the South Dakota Libertarian Party is about to begin its petition drive to regain its status as a qualified party, which it last held in 2006. Currently there are no qualified parties on the ballot in South Dakota except for the Democratic and Republican Parties. The Constitution Party had been on the ballot in 2008 and 2010, but did not poll as much as 2.5% for Governor in 2010, so went off the ballot.

When a party petitions in South Dakota in a presidential year, it is also automatically on the ballot for the following midterm year, so the 2012 Libertarian petition, if successful, will also give the party status in 2014.

The Green Party has never been ballot-qualified in South Dakota.