Libertarian Party Files Lawsuit Against New Hampshire Law Barring Petitioning in Odd Years

Earlier this year, the New Hampshire legislature passed HB 1542, which makes it illegal for a group to circulate the petition for party status during an odd year. On July 22, the Libertarian Party filed a federal lawsuit against the new restriction. Libertarian Party of N.H. v Gardner, 1:14cv-322. UPDATE: the case was assigned to Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone, a brand-new Obama appointee.

The petition for party status was created in 1996. It is so difficult, it has only been used twice, both times by the Libertarian Party, for 2000 and 2012. Both times the Libertarian Party did this petition, it started the drive in the odd year before the election year. The first attempt started in April 1999; the second attempt started in August 2011. Both times, the party took a full year to finish the job. It requires 3% of the last gubernatorial vote. No state except Oklahoma has a more difficult requirement for a group to place all its nominees on the November ballot. Oklahoma, however, permits a full year for a group to work on the petition.

New Hampshire, over the last 35 years, has made ballot access more and more difficult. In 1981 it increased the independent petition from 1,000 signatures to 3,000 signatures, and added a distribution requirement of 1,500 in each U.S. House district. In 1985 it required independent candidates (and the nominees of unqualified parties) to submit a declaration of candidacy in June, even though the petition is not due until August. In 1997 it increased the vote test for party status from 3% to 4%.

New Hampshire and Washington are the only states in the last twenty-five years that have increased the vote test for party status. Twenty-five states have eased the test during the last thirty years: Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Wyoming. There is a persistent strain of intolerance in the New Hampshire legislature toward minor parties. Such intolerance does not extend to major party candidates; they need not petition, and New Hampshire allows anyone to get on a presidential primary ballot merely by paying a fee of $1,000.

Public Policy Polling Tells Montana Respondents that Montana Only Has Two Candidates for U.S. Senate, When There are Three

On July 22, Public Policy Polling released a poll for the Montana U.S. Senate race. Respondents in this poll were told, “The candidates for U.S. Senate are Democrat John Walsh and Republican Steve Daines.” They were then asked which of the two they prefer.

There are three candidates on the November ballot for U.S. Senate in Montana. The candidate not acknowledged by PPP is Roger Roots, the Libertarian nominee. The behavior of PPP in this instance should be condemned by every person who values honesty. It is one thing for pollsters to decide to exclude certain ballot-listed candidates from their poll; it is quite another for pollsters to mislead the voters they talk to.

The results of the poll are: Steve Daines 46%, John Walsh 39%, “undecided” 15%. Thanks to PoliticalWire for the link.

Governor Andrew Cuomo’s Campaign Challenges Primary Petition of One of His Democratic Rivals

The campaign of New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is challenging the Democratic Party primary petition of Zephyr Teachout, a law professor who is also seeking the Democratic nomination for Governor. See this story. She submitted 45,000 signatures and needs 15,000 signatures of registered Democrats. Apparently Cuomo is not challenging the Democratic primary petition of Randy Credico, the third Democrat who filed. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.

Two Campaign Contributors File Lawsuit Against Federal Bifurcated Campaign Contribution Limit

Federal campaign law says that individuals may contribute up to $5,200 to the campaign of a congressional candidate. However, the law says the donor can only give $2,600 in the primary season, and may only give $2,600 in the general election season. On July 21, two potential donors filed a lawsuit against the “bifurcation” requirement. They argue that if Congress does not believe that a contribution of $5,200 to a candidate leads to a danger that the candidate will be bribed by the contribution, then there is no rational reason why the donor can’t give the entire $5,200 for the general election campaign season.

The case is Holmes v Federal Election Commission, U.S. District Court, D.C., 1:14cv-01243. Here is the 19-page complaint. Thanks to the Center for Competitive Politics for the link. The plaintiffs happen to live in Florida, but challenges to federal campaign laws are always filed in Washington, D.C. The case will probably be assigned to a 3-judge U.S. District Court, because non-frivolous challenges to federal campaign laws are entitled to a 3-judge court, by act of Congress.

Political Scientists Ray LaRaja and Brian Scaffner Say Laws that Weaken Political Parties Help Cause Polarization

Ray LaRaja and Brian Scaffner, political science professors at the University of Massachusetts, here argue that strong political parties reduce polarization. They also conclude that federal campaign finance laws, especially the McCain-Feingold law which still hobbles political parties, are partly to blame for weakening parties, and therefore increasing polarization. Thanks to several people for the link.