Illinois Redistricting Initiative Proponents are Fighting to Show They Have Enough Valid Signatures

This year, two statewide initiative petitions were submitted in Illinois. The legislative term limits measure was found to have enough valid signatures, but the initiative for an independent redistricting commission was told it doesn’t have enough valid. Backers of the redistricting commission believe they do have enough, and hearings examiners are going over each disputed signature. See this story.

Even when the initiatives have enough valid signatures, the Illinois Constitution’s procedures for statewide initiatives are so restrictive, both proposals must also fight court battles on whether or not these subjects can qualify as initiatives. Illinois has had the statewide initiative since 1970, but only once has ever statewide initiative qualified for the ballot.

New Hampshire Candidate Filing Closes

Although independent candidates, and the nominees of unqualified parties, need not submit New Hampshire petitions until August 6, they are required to file a Declaration of Candidacy by June 13.

The only petitioning candidates who filed for Congress this year are Libertarians Gardner Goldsmith for U.S. Senate, and Brian Chabot for U.S. House, 2nd district. The only petitioning candidate who filed for Governor is John D. Shea, an independent who was formerly a Democratic member of the Executive Council.

Sixteen petitioning candidates filed for State House. At least two of them are Libertarians; probably most of the remainder are independents. The Declaration of Candidacy form does not ask for party label; the candidates indicate that when they file their petitions.

Ninth Circuit Invalidates California Law Requiring Names of Initiative Proponents to be Listed on Each Petition Sheet

On June 16, the Ninth Circuit invalidated California laws that require the individual proponents of an initiative to be listed on each petition sheet. Chula Vista Citizens v Norris, 12-55726. However, the decision upholds the law that says that only individuals, not groups, may sponsor initiatives. Technically the decision only relates to city initiatives, but the constitutional principles in the decision would apply to any type of initiative.

Here is the decision
, which was 2-1. The purpose of the initiative was to repeal a city ordinance that limited contractors with the city to those who used only used unionized labor. The decision says that because initiative proponents must reveal their identifies when they file the notice that they are starting to circulate the initiative (to the City Clerk, and in a newspaper of general circulation), there is no government need to have the proponents also named on each petition sheet. The principles behind the decision are supportive of the Ohio Libertarian Party argument in Libertarian Party of Ohio v Husted; in that case Ohio requires the employer of the petitioners on each petition sheet. The Ohio case is still pending, even though the courts have refused injunctive relief to the Ohio Libertarian candidates.

Three-Candidate Poll for New York Gubernatorial Election

On June 16, Siena Polls released a New York gubernatorial election poll. The results: Democratic Andrew Cuomo 57%, Republican Rob Astorino 21%, Green Howie Hawkins 4%, someone else 1%, won’t vote 6%, don’t know 10%. See the details here; see question 25.

The petition deadline for nominees of unqualified parties, and independent candidates, is August 5. The Libertarian Party is expected to petition, and perhaps others will also. Thanks to Political Wire for the link.