Indiana Finishes Counting Write-in Votes, but Totals are Flawed; State Says it is Too Late to Complain

The Indiana Secretary of State’s office has this official vote for President, including write-in totals. However, Jay Parks of the Indiana Green Party has obtained the county-by-county breakdown, and he finds that Marion County, which is easily the most populous county in the state, only reported 2 write-ins. Vigo County, which has Terre Haute, reported zero write-ins. Parks knows of voters in those two counties who voted for Jill Stein but their votes have not been counted.

In response, the state says anyone with any complaints should have complained earlier, and it is now too late to look into the problem. Thanks to Jay Parks for the link and for the information about the problems with the tally.

Campaigns & Elections Analyzes California Congressional Race, 30th District (the Berman-Sherman Race)

Campaigns & Elections has this essay by Sean J. Miller analyzing the California 30th U.S. House race. This is the race between two incumbent Democrats, Brad Sherman and Howard Berman, who were put into the same district by redistricting. They placed first and second in the June 2012 primary and carried on a very intense, personal fight in the general election.

The article illustrates what is wrong with the theory of top-two supporters, that when there are two members of the same party in the November election, and no one else, members of the other major party can determine the winner, and therefore the winner will be a “moderate.” Both congressmen generally agreed on the big national issues, but Congressman Berman was known for his ability to work with Republican members of Congress, so his advertising tried to make that point, and to attract Republican voters. But the more he talked about his endorsement from Republicans, such as Senator John McCain, the more that persuaded liberals and Democrats that Berman didn’t deserve their vote.

The Sherman-Berman race is not an example of how top-two changed the winner in California. Even without top-two, Sherman still would have won the race, but he would have done so in the June Democratic primary, and the amount of money spent on this race would have been less. Thanks to Nancy Hanks for the link.

San Diego Union-Tribune Story on Difficulties Faced by Independent Candidates in California

The San Diego Union-Tribune has this fairly lengthy article about the difficulties independent candidates face in California. The article does not mention that outside California, 25 independent and minor party candidates were elected to state legislatures earlier this month. The article also does not mention the problem that independent candidates in California face, relative to ballot labels. Under current California law, independent candidates for Congress and partisan state office may not have “independent” printed on the ballot next to their names. Instead they are stuck with the unappealing label “no party preference.”

California 2012 Legislative Election Returns Show that, Except in One Race, Two-Republican Races Did Not Result in More “Moderates”

When California’s Proposition 14 was on the ballot in June 2010, almost every large California newspaper endorsed it, and the reason for the endorsement was invariably that the newspapers believed the top-two system would reduce the number of anti-tax California state legislators, and instead would boost the election of “moderate” Republicans. In this context, “moderate” always meant a Republican who would not take a hard line against any tax increases.

Proposition 14 boosters were especially hopeful that in legislative races with two Republicans on the November ballot, and no other candidates, that the Democrats and independents in those districts would vote for the more “moderate” Republican, leading to more such Republicans in the legislature.

However, the 2012 election shows these ideas about how Proposition 14 would work were mostly incorrect. California had seven legislative races with two Republicans on the ballot in November, and in only one of them did a “moderate” (on taxes) defeat a hard-line anti-tax Republican. That was the Assembly race in the 5th district, in the Sierra Nevada foothills, where Frank Bigelow defeated Rico Oller. Bigelow had refused to sign the “no tax increase” pledge whereas Oller had signed it.

In Assembly District One in northeast California, both Republicans on the November ballot, Brian Dahle and Rick Bosetti were equally opposed to tax increases. The winner, Brian Dahle, was endorsed by the Tea Party, whereas the other Republican, Rick Bosetti, was endorsed by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, a well-known anti-tax group in California.

In Assembly District Six, in the northeast Sacramento suburbs, both Republicans were equally opposed to tax increases. The winner, incumbent Beth Gaines, was endorsed by the Howard Jarvis Association.

In Assembly District 23, in Fresno, the more conservative Republican, Jim Patterson, defeated the other Republican, Bob Whalen. Patterson emphasized the label “conservative” in his campaign ads, whereas Whalen stressed that he had been endorsed by unions and by three current or past Democratic members of the Fresno city council.

In Assembly District 67, in southwest Riverside County, both Republicans were equally anti-tax. Melissa Melendez defeated Phil Paule, and both are listed as Tea Party candidates. Melendez attacked Paule for having voted to raise water rates while he was a member of the water board, but Paule defended himself by pointing out that water rates are not taxes.

In Assembly District 72, in Orange County, Travis Allen defeated Troy Edgar. Allen’s campaign message was “Stop the endless calls for higher and higher taxes”, although Edgar also said he was opposed to raising taxes.

In Assembly District 76, in northwest San Diego County, Rocky Chavez defeated Sherry Hodges. Chavez had been endorsed by the Howard Jarvis Association and had said he would not vote for any tax increase. Hodges had said, “There may be a time to raise taxes.”

This blog post does not include the instances at which Republican “moderates” failed to place first or second in the June primary and thus were not on the November ballot.

There were no State Senate races with just two Republicans on the ballot.

The reason that the theory used by most California editorial writers doesn’t work is that when there are two Republicans on the November ballot, and one Republican gets a reputation for being the choice of liberals and Democrats, the word gets around in that district, and then the other Republican benefits from a backlash.