Volunteers Needed in Montpelier, Vermont, if Presidential Write-in Results Are Ever to be Known to History

Vermont permits write-in votes, but does not have a law that requires candidates to file a declaration of write-in candidacy. Therefore, to the extent that any write-ins for President are tallied depends on the good will of the Vermont Secretary of State’s office. In 2008, the Secretary of State tallied the write-ins for Green Party presidential nominee Cynthia McKinney. This year the office says it does not have the resources to tally any presidential write-in votes.

But, Kathleen Scheele, Director of Elections, says that if outside volunteers visit her office, they will be permitted to not only examine the election results sent in by each town clerk, but that if these volunteers tally the write-ins, she will accept their work product and place the tally on official letterhead. Having the returns on official letterhead stationery means that the various publications that tally the final, official vote for President will include these votes.

Therefore, if anyone living near Montpelier, Vermont, is willing to do this interesting work, for at least some of the write-in candidates, he or she should contact Scheele. Her e-mail is kscheele@sec.state.vt.us. The Vermont ballot last month did not include Jill Stein, nor Virgil Goode, nor Roseanne Barr, and they are probably the three actual presidential candidates who received the most write-ins. Of course, anyone would be free to tally any or all presidential write-ins, and chances are there were many write-ins for Ron Paul as well, and his total would be interesting.

Ninth Circuit Sets Hearing Date on California Case Challenging Discriminatory Law on Party Labels

The Ninth Circuit will hear Chamness v Bowen on February 13, Wednesday, in its courthouse on the western edge of Pasadena. This is the case that challenges California law that permits some members of political parties to list their party affiliation on the ballot, whereas certain other members of political parties are not permitted to list their party affiliation. Also, the law does not permit independent candidates to have the ballot label “independent” on the ballot. Instead they must use the label “no party preference”. However, California still permits independent presidential candidates to be listed on the ballot as “independent.”

A survey of California’s independent candidates for Congress and state legislature, conducted in June 2012, found that more than two-thirds of those candidates wished they could have “independent” on the ballot. The only independent candidates who said they didn’t want “independent” were a few who worried that “independent” would be confused with “American Independent.” Also, a few of the independent candidates could never be reached.

Anyone who is in southern California on February 13, 2013, should consider attending this hearing. The Court has set aside 40 minutes for the hearing. The Courthouse, at 125 South Grand Avenue, Pasadena, is one of the nation’s most beautiful courthouses. It was once a luxury hotel and is set in extensive gardens. The building is entirely for the use of the Ninth Circuit when it hears cases in southern California, and is not a courthouse for any other court.

Oklahoma Minor Parties Dismiss Ballot Access Lawsuit due to Procedural Hurdle; New Case May be Filed

On January 31, 2012, the Oklahoma Libertarian Party and the Oklahoma Green Party filed a lawsuit, challenging the state’s ballot access procedure for newly-qualifying parties, which this year required 51,739 valid signatures due March 1 (the state defends the early deadline on the grounds that all parties, even newly-qualifying parties, must choose nominees in the June primary). On June 21, the attorney for the parties asked for permission to amend the Complaint, to specifically allege that it is unconstitutional for a state to require a newly-qualifying party to nominate by primary, in the context that that requires a petition deadline as early as March.

After almost six months, the judge in the case has not ruled on the request to amend the complaint. Therefore, the plaintiffs determined to dismiss the case, and did so on December 17. Any new case will certainly include this point in the original complaint. Of course, the legislature is free to amend the existing law, and bill proposals have been submitted already into the 2013 session of the legislature, although they won’t be available for public viewing, and won’t have bill numbers, until January.

The Constitution of Oklahoma does not require newly-qualifying parties to nominate by primary. The Constitution gives discretion to the legislature to determine if newly-qualifying parties should nominate by primary or convention. Article III, section 3, says that the Legislature “may enact laws providing a mandatory primary system” but does not say that the legislature must do so, and that all parties must be included. Earlier this year, the Tennessee legislature provided that newly-qualifying parties may nominate by convention if they wish. In Tennessee, newly-qualifying parties that choose to nominate by convention are free to submit their petition as late as August 1. The California legislature is likely to pass a somewhat similar plan soon.

The Oklahoma Constitution, Article III, section 5, says, “All elections shall be free and equal. No power, civil or military, shall ever interfere to prevent the free exercise of the right of suffrage.” Yet last month, no voter in Oklahoma was permitted to vote for anyone for President except President Obama and Mitt Romney. As this analysis shows, over 20,000 Oklahoma voters would have voted for Gary Johnson if they had been permitted to do so, with an unknown number also desiring to vote for other bona fide candidates who were not on the Oklahoma ballot.

Only One U.S. Senate Incumbent was Defeated for Re-Election Last Month

This Bloomberg article describes the unusually high re-election rate for incumbent members of Congress running for re-election last month. Perhaps most surprising is that only one incumbent U.S. Senator was defeated for re-election in the November election (also one incumbent was defeated in a primary earlier in the year).

In the House, only 40 incumbents were defeated, and in 13 of those instances, two incumbents were running against each other, so defeat of an incumbent was inevitable. Thanks to Thomas Jones for the link.

Virginia State Board of Elections Releases Write-in Presidential Votes

The Virginia State Board of Elections says the following declared write-in presidential candidates received these votes: Rocky Anderson 76, Jill Reed 14, Sheila Tittle 1, Joseph Glean 4. These results are not posted on the Virginia State Board of Elections’ web page. Some news sources that report vote totals will therefore not be aware of these votes.