U.S. District Court Sets Hearing in Ohio Libertarian Primary Ballot Access Lawsuit

On March 10, U.S. District Court Judge Michael Watson scheduled a hearing in Libertarian Party of Ohio v Husted, for March 11, at 2 p.m. The hearing will consider the Libertarian Party’s new request, filed March 7, for injunctive relief putting the statewide Libertarian candidates back on the party’s primary ballot. The primary is May 6, so speed is essential. The state has not yet responded to the March 7 Libertarian filing, so it is likely the March 11 will set forth the rules by which the case is adjudicated.

Also on March 10, an attorney for the individual who challenged the Libertarian Party’s gubernatorial ticket filed a request that he be allowed to intervene in the case. UPDATE: see this news story.

Article on Working Families Party Suggests Medium Probability that Party Won’t Cross-Endorse Andrew Cuomo

This lengthy and interesting story about the Working Families Party, by Sarah Jaffe, covers news about the party across the nation, especially Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and Oregon. But perhaps the most interesting part of the story is at the end, where Jaffe analyzes whether the New York branch will cross-endorse Andrew Cuomo for Governor this year. Thanks to Thomas MacMillan for the link.

The story does not mention the WFP’s activity in South Carolina, another state where it is on the ballot and engages in fusion electoral activity. Nor does it mention that the party was formerly ballot-qualified in Delaware, but when Delaware abolished fusion, the party did not take efforts to remain ballot-qualified.

Utah House Passes Bill to Move Presidential Primary so that Utah Votes First

On March 10, the Utah House passed HB 410 by a vote of 58-14. The bill says that Utah’s presidential primary will be on a date that makes it earlier than any other state’s primary or caucus. However, the bill only goes into effect if the Utah legislature appropriates funds to hold the primary, and only if the Utah legislature passes a bill in the future making the vote on-line.

All of the “no” votes were cast by Republicans.

New Mexico Governor Signs Ballot Access Improvement Bill

On March 7, New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez signed HB 368, which makes three ballot access improvements: (1) the petition deadline for a newly-qualifying party moves from April to late June; (2) signatures on that petition are presumed valid and do not need individual checking; (3) the number of signatures for a different type of petition, the nominee petition, are reduced from 1% of the last vote cast, to 1% of the last gubernatorial vote. That last change has no impact in presidential election years, but it lowers the number of signatures in midterm years by approximately 25%. For 2014, the nominee petitions for statewide office will be 6,018 signatures. The bill takes effect immediately.

This bill only came into existence because in December 2013, the Constitution Party won its lawsuit against the April petition deadline. Frequently when a minor party or independent candidate wins a constitutional lawsuit on one point, the legislature responds favorably by not only fixing the law declared void, but also makes other improvements.

New Mexico is the only state that requires a petition for a party nominee. The requirement was passed in 1969 and does not apply to presidential nominees. The requirement only applies to qualified minor parties, not qualified major parties. The nominee petition requirement is illogical. Once a candidate has been nominated by a ballot-qualified party, that candidate should be deemed to have a modicum of popular support and should not need his or her own separate petition. Maryland once had such nominee petitions but the State Appeals Court ruled them unconstitutional in 2003.