Minor Party and Independent Candidates for U.S. Senate Received 3.3% of Total Vote Cast for U.S. Senate

On November 5, minor party and independent candidates for U.S. Senate received 3.3% of the total vote cast for U.S. Senate. This does not include write-in votes. Also this only includes the 33 regularly-scheduled Senate elections, not special elections.

Ten of the 33 states with U.S. Senate elections had no minor party or independent candidate on the ballot. Obviously if all 33 states had had minor party or independent candidates, the “other” total would have been significantly higher.

The states with only a Republican and a Democrat on the ballot for U.S. Senate were: California, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

New Jersey State Appeals Court Hears Arguments Over Whether Fusion Ban Violates State Constitution

On December 10, a New Jersey state appeals court heard arguments in In Re Malinowski, A-3542-21T2. Here is a news story about the hearing. The three judges seemed very engaged in the case, and although the story says they didn’t tip their hand about their opinions, fusion advocates left the hearing feeling optimistic.

Republican Member of the House Takes a Move Toward Independent Status

On December 16, U.S. House member Victoria Spartz, who has been elected as an Indiana Republican three times, said she is leaving the House Republican Conference and that she will not participate in the Republican Caucus. However, she will remain a member of the Republican Party.

Indiana does not have registration by party, so the only method in which party membership can be determined is statements from the individual.

She lives in Noblesville and represents the Fifth Indiana District. She was born in Ukraine.

Currently there are no independents in the U.S. House.

James Moyer, Author Whose Book Publicizes that Voters in the Past Could Vote for Individual Presidential Elector Candidates, Creates Website

James Moyer wrote a book several years ago, explaining to readers that in the past, voters could vote for individual candidates for presidential elector. The book is “Winner-Takes-All: The Secret History of the Electoral College.” By 1984, voters in all states had lost this ability. Vermont and Louisiana had been the last states to let voters cast votes for individual elector candidates.

Now Moyer has put up a webiste about this. See it here. If one goes to the website, one can play a very clear ten-minute youtube that furnishes the information that is in the book.

If ballots still let voters vote for each individual elector candidate, the law on presidential qualifications would be much clearer than it is now. Most states won’t print the names of presidential candidates on their ballots if that candidate doesn’t meet the constitutional qualifications. But if people understood that the true candidates in November are the elector candidates, that policy would change. Back in 1892, when the Prohibition Party nominated a 33-year-old for vice-president, no state kept the ticket off the ballot, and the Prohibition Party was on every government-printed ballot in the nation, except for South Dakota; and the South Dakota omission had nothing to do with the qualifications issue.