Public Policy Polling Finds Libertarian at 11% in North Carolina U.S. Senate Race

On May 13, Public Policy Polling released a poll for the North Carolina U.S. Senate race. The results: Democratic incumbent Kay Hagan 38%, Republican Thom Tillis 36%, Libertarian Sean Haugh 11%, undecided 15%. See here for more details. Thanks to PoliticalWire for the link.

North Carolina does not have any other statewide offices on the ballot this year. All the state executive posts are elected in presidential years.

Patrick J. Lucey, Vice-Presidential Candidate with John B. Anderson, Dies

On May 10, former Wisconsin Governor Patrick J. Lucey died at the age of 96. See this New York Times obituary. He was John B. Anderson’s vice-presidential running mate in 1980, when the independent ticket got on the ballot in all 50 states and polled 6.61% of the vote.

Anderson set out on his independent candidacy on April 24, 1980, but could not find a suitable vice-presidential candidate until August 27, 1980. The vast majority of states put Lucey on the November ballot, even though Anderson’s ballot access petitions had circulated with stand-ins. The Anderson-Lucey ticket won lawsuits against Indiana, Pennsylvania, and Florida, to force state election officials to print Lucey’s name on the ballot instead of the stand-ins. Thanks to J. David Gillespie for the link.

One of Congressman Conyers’ Circulators Files Lawsuit Against Michigan Restriction

On May 12, one of the petitioners for Congressman John Conyers filed her own lawsuit against the Michigan law that says only registered voters can circulate candidate petitions. An additional plaintiff is a voter who wants to vote for Conyers. The case is Willis-Pittman v Johnson, e.d., 2:14cv-11903. The case is assigned to Judge Linda Parker, who has only been a federal judge since March 2014. Thanks to Thomas Jones for this news.

U.S. District Court Sets Hearing in Michigan Case on Registration Requirement for Petition Circulators

U.S. District Court Judge Gershwin A. Drain, an Obama appointee, will hear Davis v Johnson on Thursday, May 15, at 10 a.m. This is the case in which Robert Davis, a candidate for re-election to the Highland Park School Board, hopes to invalidate the Michigan law that requires circulators for candidate petitions to be registered voters. The School Board election is non-partisan.

The request for the hearing makes reference to Congressman John Conyers. The brief says, “Plaintiff Davis believes the Court should be aware that the question of whether Congressman John Conyers will have sufficient signatures to qualify to have his name placed on the August primary election ballot will be impacted similarly by this Court’s decision on Plaintiff Davis’ motion.”

The state’s brief is due Tuesday, May 13. It is possible the state will argue that, even if the state loses the Davis case, that has no impact on Conyers. The state might argue that there is a difference between non-partisan candidates such as Davis, and candidates running in a partisan primary such as Conyers. However, if the state does make that argument, it would seem to be a weak argument. Michigan does not have registration by party. If Michigan did have registration by party, the state could argue that only party members should be allowed to circulate candidate petitions and the only way to know if the circulator is a party member, is to require that the circulator be registered. But, without registration by party, that argument can’t be made.

Ninth Circuit Strikes Down Arizona Laws Restricting Some Political Activity by Candidates for State Judge

On May 9, the Ninth Circuit struck down Arizona laws that prohibit candidates for state judge to engage in certain forms of political activity. The decision in Wolfson v Concannon, 11-17634, says that the state cannot prevent candidates for judge from soliciting campaign contributions, making speeches on behalf of a political party or on behalf of another candidate, or endorsing another candidate.

The decision
leaves intact laws that prohibit sitting judges from doing those things. The decision was 2-1. The dissenting judge would have struck down only the ban on raising money, but left the other prohibitions intact.

Only the smaller counties in Arizona elect trial court judges. They are elected on a partisan basis.