Virginia Bill, Curtailing Counting of Write-in Votes, Advances

On January 15, a Subcommittee of the Virginia House Elections & Privileges Committee passed HB 105 unanimously. Current law says that write-ins in general elections should not be counted unless it appears that a write-in candidate might have received 5% or more of the vote. The bill changes that, so that write-ins would only be counted if it appears that a write-in candidate might have won the election.

Virginia does count all presidential write-ins for declared write-in presidential candidates, and HB 105 does not appear to affect presidential write-ins.

Text of Montana’s Cert Petition in Case On Whether Parties Should be Allowed to Support or Oppose Judicial Candidates

Here is the text of Montana’s cert petition to the U.S. Supreme Court in Fox v Sanders County Republican Committee, 13-839. The issue is a state law that makes it illegal for political parties to endorse or oppose a candidate for state judge. Montana elects state court judges in non-partisan elections. The Ninth Circuit had struck down the law on a 2-1 vote.

Washington Post Carries Political Scientist’s Explanation of Why U.S. Parties Now Seem so Polarized

Political Scientist Hans Noel has this commentary in the Washington Post, about U.S. political parties, ideology, and polarization. The thesis is that the U.S. has long been divided by ideology. If parties didn’t seem polarized in the past, that is because there were liberals and conservatives in both major parties. But in recent years, “sorting” has been carried out, so that today, virtually all liberal politicians are Democrats and virtually all conservative politicians are Republicans.

Noel has written a book, “Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America”, which will be in print in February 2014.