Shawn Steel, a former California Republican Party chair, has this interesting account of the California June 2012 outcome for the 74th Assembly District. The incumbent, who was the more conservative of the two Republicans running, placed first, and a second candidate, a Democrat, placed second, so they will be the only two candidates in November. The third candidate, the recipient of hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign assistance from adherents of the top-two primary system, only polled 23% and came in third.

On August 3, Patrick Manning won a lawsuit in New York Supreme Court, retaining his spot on the Republican primary ballot as a candidate for Assembly. New York requires legislative candidates to have lived in New York for the preceding five years. Manning’s ballot status was challenged on the grounds that he had been registered to vote at his vacation home in Massachusetts during that period. However, the Court found that Manning was a resident of New York during the entire period. See this story. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for the link.

On August 6, U.S. District Court Judge George C. Smith, a Reagan appointee, will hear Jolivette v Husted, southern district, 2:12-cv-603. Greg Jolivette submitted enough valid signatures to be on the November ballot as an independent candidate for State House, 51st district. Election officials still kept him off the ballot, because they say he was too recently a member of the Republican Party.

Ohio laws on who may qualify as an independent candidate are the vaguest laws in the U.S. Ohio does not have partisan registration. However, elections officials keep track of which party’s primary ballot a voter chooses. Jolivette did not vote in the Republican primary of March, 2012. But in 2011, he held himself out as a Republican and even started to petition onto the Republican primary ballot, but he then withdrew that Republican petition.

Ohio election law does not say an independent candidate must have had nothing to do with a political party. It just bans “sore losers”. Jolivette argues not only that he qualifies as an independent, but that in any event the law is hopelessly vague. See this story about the case. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.