Presidential Primary Turnout Nationwide in 2012 was Less than Half the 2008 Presidential Primary Turnout

According to The Rhodes Cook Letter of June 2012, only 27,828,871 votes were cast in Republican and Democratic presidential primaries combined during 2012. By contrast, in 2008, 57,689,496 votes were cast in Republican and Democratic presidential primaries. Yet there were almost as many states in 2012 that held presidential primaries (39 states) as in 2008 (41 states). The two states that held primaries in 2008 but not in 2012 are Idaho and Washington.

Florida Secretary of State Files Brief in Lawsuit Over Whether Democratic Primary Should be Open to Non-Democrats

On July 19, the Florida Secretary of State filed this brief in Mazzilli v Townsley, the case over whether the August 2012 Democratic primary should be open to non-Democrats, for the office of Miami-Dade County State Attorney. The judge had asked the Secretary of State to enter the case. The case was filed by some voters who want to vote in the Democratic primary for State Attorney, even though they are not registered Democrats.

U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, Asks Board of Elections to Respond to Libertarian Party Request for Rehearing in Case on Counting Write-ins

On July 19, the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, asked the Board of Elections to file a response to the Libertarian Party’s petition for rehearing. The case is Libertarian Party v D.C. Board of Elections, 11-7029. This is the case over whether declared write-in presidential candidates are entitled to have their votes counted.

On June 8, a 3-judge panel in this court had upheld the Board of Elections policy of refusing to count the write-ins for declared presidential candidates. The Libertarian Party had then asked for a rehearing en banc. It is somewhat unusual for a court to ask for a response, when a petition for rehearing is filed. This means that the judges are seriously considering whether to grant a rehearing.

The original decision erroneously said that the Libertarian Party believes that all write-ins must be counted, when actually the party’s briefs have been very clear that the party only asks that the write-ins for the declared presidential candidates be counted. In 2008, Bob Barr was the only presidential candidate who filed to have his write-ins counted. Filing for write-ins status requires a certain amount of work, including finding three candidates for presidential elector who have lived in the District of Columbia for the past three years.

U.S. District Court in Alabama Refuses to Enjoin March Petition Deadline for Newly-Qualifying Parties

On July 19, U.S. District Court Judge W. Keith Watkins refused to enjoin Alabama’s March petition deadline for newly-qualifying parties. The case is Stein v Chapman, Middle District, 2:12-cv-42. His 19-page opinion says that the three plaintiff parties, the Constitution, Green, and Libertarian Parties, failed to show that the March deadline injured them.

The opinion acknowledges the U.S. Supreme Court precedent Anderson v Celebrezze, which struck down Ohio’s March 20 deadline for independent presidential candidates. It also acknowledges the 11th circuit opinion New Alliance Party v Hand, which struck down Alabama’s April petition deadline in 1991, at a time when Alabama only required signatures of 1% of the last gubernatorial vote, instead of the 3% currently required. But it says those cases submitted much more evidence about the harm done by the early deadlines. That is a peculiar conclusion. The point of precedent in law is that once a law has been declared unconstitutional, if a state continues to enforce that law (or if the state repeals the law but later restores it), plaintiffs in a new lawsuit should not be required to build an evidentiary record from scratch; the prior precedent is supposed to control.

The opinion mentions Bergland v Harris, which says that states have less interest in keeping presidential candidates off their ballot than in keeping other candidates off the ballot. But the opinion does not discuss Bergland v Harris; there is just a sentence acknowledging that the judge is aware of the decision.

The case is still alive, and a decision about declaratory relief is months away, and won’t effect the 2012 election in Alabama.