Picture of Page One of Florida November 2012 Ballot

Here is a pdf of most of page one of the November 2012 ballot from Palm Beach County, Florida. Florida has 12 presidential candidates on its ballot, the second-highest number of any state this year. Colorado has the most, sixteen.

Nevertheless, the presidential part of this Florida ballot is very clear and easy to read. The only flaw is that Palm Beach County, like many other Florida counties, abbreviates the names of political parties to only three letters instead of printing the whole name of the party.

The order of the presidential candidates is determined this way: for parties that have at least 5% of the registration, the party that got the most votes for Governor in the last election is listed first, and the other such parties in order of gubernatorial vote. For parties with registration under 5%, candidates are listed in the order of filing their presidential electors. The Objectivist Party has the third spot on the ballot for President. Thanks to Steve Kolbert for the link.

News Story About Rob Sobhani, Independent U.S. Senate Candidate in Maryland who has Spent $4,600,000 on His Campaign So Far

Southern Maryland Online has this interesting story about Rob Sobhani, who is an independent candidate for U.S. Senate in Maryland. He has already spent $4,600,000 on his campaign, and is in second place in the polls, ahead of the Republican nominee but behind incumbent Senator Benjamin Cardin, a Democrat.

Sobhani has roots in Iran. The fourth candidate in the race, Libertarian nominee, Dean Ahmad, has Palestinian roots. Southern Maryland Online is an on-line newspaper that serves Charles, Calvert, and St. Marys Counties.

Sobhani will probably set a new record for a U.S. Senate candidate in Maryland who is not a major party nominee. The highest share of the vote in Maryland history for anyone running for U.S. Senate, who is not a major party nominee, is 13.1%. That was obtained in 1968 by George Mahoney, an independent who was opposed to civil rights laws concerning discrimination in housing.

Washington Post’s Melinda Henneberger Explores the Meaning of Voting for a Minor Party or Independent Presidential Candidate

Melinda Henneberger is a political writer for the Washington Post. In this October 20 column, she explores the meaning of voting for a presidential candidate whose ideas may reflect the voter’s own ideas, in the context of a close presidential election. Henneberger gives clues that she actually agrees with Jill Stein, but questions whether it is rational to vote for a candidate who can’t win.

It is maddening that Henneberger cannot bring herself to talk about alternative voting systems, such as proportional representation, instant-runoff voting, or approval voting. Of course proportional representation cannot apply to an office that elects a single winner, and any mention of proportional representation in the context of an election for the nation’s chief executive would also need to explore parliamentary systems.

But it is a welcome sign that the Post is mentioning minor party presidential candidates this year as much as it has.

No California Newspaper Has Yet Mentioned Court Decision of Three Days Ago, Invalidating Ballot Access Law for Newly-Qualifying Parties

It has now been three days since a U.S. District Court in Los Angeles invalidated California’s law on how a party gets on the ballot, and the only news sources that have reported the decision are Rick Hasen’s ElectionLawBlog, and Ballot Access News, and the web page of the ACLU of Southern California. The ACLU, which won this case, put out a press release, but it seems to have been ignored by California’s daily newspapers.

Lane County, Oregon, Voters Will Choose a Countywide Circuit Judge via Write-in Votes

Lane County, Oregon, is the 4th most populous county in Oregon, and contains Eugene. Lane County voters will elect a circuit court judge by write-in vote in the upcoming election. See this story. The incumbent judge failed to qualify for the ballot because of a paperwork error.

Four individuals have announced that they are running for the seat. Oregon no longer has a procedure by which individuals file as declared write-in candidates. Instead, write-in votes are not counted in most elections, except that the total number of write-ins for all candidates is tallied, with no breakdown for how many votes any particular candidate received. But, section 254.500(b) says that when no candidate qualifies to have his or her name printed on the ballot, a tally must be made for each candidate who receives as much as one write-in vote.