New York Governor Asks Legislature to Lower Number of Signatures for Statewide and Legislative Candidates

On June 11, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo presented several election law proposals to the legislature. Here is a copy of his Draft Proposal #5, which would lower the number of signatures for statewide office (both for primary ballot access and general election access) from 15,000 signatures to 10,000. The proposal also would lower the number of primary candidates for State Senate from 1,000 signatures to 500; for Assembly primary candidates from 500 to 250 signatures; for independent State Senate candidates from 3,000 to 1,650; and for independent Assembly candidates from 1,500 to 750 signatures. The lower independent petition requirements would be equally applicable to the nominees of unqualified parties.

Another part of the same draft requires larger print size for names of candidates on ballots.

The Governor has a draft of another election law bill which would make it possible for voters to switch party affiliation up until three months before a primary. Current law on voters switching parties is easily the most restrictive in the nation. Voters must join a party in one calendar year in order to vote in the following year’s primary for that party. UPDATE: see this article about the Governor’s election law bills. He is no longer trying to repeal the Wilson-Pakula law, which won’t let candidates run in a party primary unless the candidate is a member of that party, or that candidate gets permission from party leaders.

Santa Fe, New Mexico Democratic Party to Hold Forum on Whether Democrats Should Let Independents Vote in Democratic Primaries

On June 19, the Santa Fe County Democratic Party will sponsor a forum, on the subject of whether the Democratic Party should let independent voters vote in Democratic primaries. See this announcement.

New Mexico was one of the last states to hold partisan primaries. Before 1938, all parties in New Mexico nominated for all office by party meetings. Ever since 1938, New Mexico primaries have been closed to all but party members. In New Mexico, smaller qualified parties still nominate by convention.

Pennsylvania State Court Explains Why Challengers to 2012 Libertarian Petition Need Not Pay Court Costs

As is well-known to most readers, Pennsylvania is the only state in which the validity of petitions can only be determined by a court, and the proceedings for statewide petitions in court runs to hundreds of thousands of dollars. Back on March 13, 2013, but not previously noted here, a Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court issued a 14-page opinion, explaining why the Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania cannot recover court costs from the people who objected to the party’s statewide petition, even though the Libertarians won the court case and did appear on the ballot.

Page ten of the opinion says “Although the large number of erroneous challenges (by the people who challenged the Libertarian petition) is disturbing, it does not by itself show bad faith by Objectors where Objectors also affirmatively cooperated to resolve the validity disputes by stipulation and there was a substantial amount of error on both sides.” This decision tends to illustrate how arbitrary the Pennsylvania system is, on the variable of when court costs are or aren’t awarded. It also shows how vague the system is on the variable of when the winning side must request payment. Thanks to Tom Stevens for the link to the opinion.