The Ninth Circuit will hear Sanders County Republican Central Committee v Bullock in late August. This is the case over whether it violates the First Amendment for Montana to make it a crime for a political party to endorse a candidate for judge. Montana elects state court judges in non-partisan elections. Here is the scheduling order. Thanks to Rick Hasen’s ElectionLawBlog for the link. The lower court had refused to enjoin the Montana prohibition, and the Republican Party had then appealed.
Recently, Ron Paul was asked on-air about his vote in November for President. He said, “I’ve not made a decision.” See this story.
On July 20, Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted filed a notice of appeal in Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless v Husted. See the previous coverage of this case here. Husted is asking the 6th circuit to rule that the state should be released from its 2006 promise to count provisional ballots that were cast in the wrong precinct, but the right building, when the error is not the voter’s fault. See this story.
As has been previously reported, in 2011 a U.S. District Court Judge put the Ohio Libertarian Party on the ballot for the 2012 election, which caused the Ohio Secretary of State to also put other minor parties on the 2012 ballot (Americans Elect, Constitution, Green, and Socialist). The Secretary of State did not appeal the 2011 decision, but the Ohio legislature intervened in the case and appealed to the 6th Circuit. The hearing for the legislature’s appeal is set for July 24 in Cincinnati.
On July 13, the three judges who are hearing the state legislature’s appeal sent a letter to both sides, saying, “Dear Counsel, the panel assigned to hear the case on the merits is requesting a letter brief on the effect of 2012 Ohio Sess.Law Serv.105 (repealing HB 194 and restoring Ohio’s ballot access deadline for the general election to November 2011)(eff. August 15, 2012) on the above appeal. The letter brief should not exceed ten pages in length and must be filed by noon on July 20, 2012.”
This letter suggests that the three judges tend to think the state legislature’s appeal may be moot. Both sides have now filed letter briefs, responding to the Court’s letter. This provided an opportunity for the Libertarian Party to tell the court about the action of the legislature in June 2012, extending the deadline for the Democratic and Republican Parties to certify their presidential and vice-presidential candidates, but not giving similar relief to the other qualified parties. That issue is not directly related to this case, but it is relevant because the Libertarian Party’s attorney is showing that the legislature cannot be trusted to ever pass a constitutional ballot access law, and that it continues to be unreasonably hostile to minor parties.
The legislature’s brief of July 20 quotes the part of the Court’s letter that says the repeal of HB 194 restores Ohio’s ballot access deadline for the general election back to November 2011. Then, the legislature’s letter says, “This is incorrect.” Instead, the legislature says, there was no valid petition deadline back in 2011, nor is there one today. If that is true, one wonders why the legislature thinks the U.S. District Court was wrong to have put the Libertarian Party on the ballot.
Here is the Libertarian Party’s recent brief; it is 10 pages. Here is the state legislature’s brief; it is 5 pages.
According to The Rhodes Cook Letter of June 2012, only 27,828,871 votes were cast in Republican and Democratic presidential primaries combined during 2012. By contrast, in 2008, 57,689,496 votes were cast in Republican and Democratic presidential primaries. Yet there were almost as many states in 2012 that held presidential primaries (39 states) as in 2008 (41 states). The two states that held primaries in 2008 but not in 2012 are Idaho and Washington.