Senator Rand Paul, according to this story, recently said in a speech, “I am not a libertarian.” Thanks to PoliticalWire for the link.
On May 16, the Fourth Circuit heard Bland v Roberts, 12-1671. The issue is whether the Sheriff of Hampton, Virginia, improperly fired a deputy because the deputy “liked” the sheriff’s opponent in the 2009 election. The U.S. Supreme Court in the past ruled that government employees cannot be fired because of their political statements. However, when the fired deputy sued, the U.S. District Court ruled that when the deputy “liked” the sheriff’s opponent on Facebook, that was not a political statement.
The U.S. District Court decision says, “It is the Court’s conclusion that merely ‘liking’ a Facebook page is insufficient speech to merit constitutional protection.” The candidate then appealed, and Facebook intervened in the case and was permitted to participate in the oral argument, to argue that the U.S. District Court was wrong. Here is an article published before the hearing was held. The U.S. District Court decision was handed down on April 24, 2012, and is eastern district 4:llcv45. UPDATE: Here is a story about the hearing. The three judges were William B. Traxler, Stephanie Thacker, and Ellen Hollander. Thanks to HowAppealing for both links.
On May 2, the Hawaii legislature adjourned, without having passed any election law bills this year. Several bills had passed each house of the legislature, but because the versions of the bills differed in each house, they were sent to conference committees. But none of the election law bills send to conference committee ever emerged from those committees.
Bills that had passed both houses of the legislature, but still died, included bills for vote by mail, election day registration, and public funding for candidates for the state legislature.
The legislature did pass a Resolution, SCR 135, calling on Congress to pass a constitutional amendment giving full voting rights to the District of Columbia. Here is the text.
On May 15, the Michigan Libertarian Party and Gary Johnson asked the 6th circuit to rehear the ballot access case from last year, Libertarian Party of Michigan v Ruth Johnson. The issue is whether Michigan’s “sore loser” can be applied to presidential primaries, and also whether the Michigan law in fact does pertain to presidential primaries. Here is the brief.
Until 2012, no minor party presidential candidate had ever been kept off a November ballot on the basis that he or she had run in a major party presidential primary. Presidential primaries have existed in the U.S. starting in 1912. In the 26 presidential elections starting in 1912, there have been eleven presidential elections in which someone who had run in a major party presidential primary had also appeared as a minor party or independent presidential candidate in November. Those elections, and the candidates involved, were 1912 Theodore Roosevelt, 1924 Robert La Follette, 1932 Jacob S. Coxey, 1952 Douglas MacArthur, 1968 Eugene Mc Carthy, 1980 John B. Anderson, 1984 Lyndon LaRouche, 1988 David Duke, 1992 Lenora Fulani and Lyndon LaRouche, 2008 Ron Paul and Alan Keyes, 2012 Gary Johnson. Gary Johnson himself ran in eight Republican presidential primaries in 2012. Only Michigan in 2012 decided to interpret its “sore loser” law to apply to presidential primaries. And even Michigan itself admits that its sore loser law doesn’t apply to independent presidential candidates, thus implicitly acknowledging that it has no strong interest in the restriction it imposed on Johnson. Also, in 1980, Michigan interpreted the same law to not apply to presidential primaries, and let John Anderson on the November ballot as a minor party candidate even though he had run in the 1980 Michigan Republican primary. The courts, so far in this case, have not grappled with these points.
British Columbia held an election for its own legislature on May 14. The Green Party elected Andrew Weaver. He is the first Green Party member elected to the body. The other results: Liberal Party won 50 seats; New Democratic Party won 33 seats; one independent was elected.
The distribution of the popular vote was: Liberal 44.4%, New Democratic 39.5%, Green 8.0%, Conservative 4.8%, others 3.3%.
Canada uses the same election system that the United States uses. Whoever gets the most votes is the winner.