Georgia Libertarian Party Appeals to Eleventh Circuit in U.S. House Ballot Access Case

On September 25, the Georgia Libertarian Party appealed Cowen v Raffensperger to the Eleventh Circuit. This is the case filed in 2017 over the Georgia ballot access law for minor party and independent candidates for U.S. House. The case had mostly lost, but the Equal Protection part of the case had been still alive until last month., when the U.S. District Court had dismissed it entirely.

Shortly before the U.S. District Court had dismissed the case entirely, the Libertarian Party had informed the judge that this year, the Georgia legislature had changed the law for presidential ballot access. The new law said a minor party can be on for president even if it has no support whatsoever inside Georgia. The new law lets a minor party be on for president automatically in Georgia if it is on for president in at least 20 other jurisdictions.

The party argued that this undercuts the state’s defense of the U.S. House requirement. The state had argued that a state has a compelling interest in keeping candidates off the ballot unless they have overwhelming support, but that argument is contradicted by the new presidential access law. But the U.S. District Court wouldn’t let the party amend its Complaint to make this point, so now the party is appealing to the Eleventh Circuit.

U.S. District Court Won’t Require Wisconsin to Put Shiva Ayyadurai on Ballot

On September 10, U.S. District Court Judge William C. Griesbach, a Bush Jr. appointee, issued an order in Marshall v Wisconsin Election Commission, e.d., 1:24cv-1095. He refused to put Shiva Ayyadurai on the ballot as an independent candidate, even though the petition had enough valid signatures. The reason is that Ayyadurai was born in India.

The four-page order says the case is frivolous on its face. Yet the issues are not frivolous, and were the subject of extensive briefing in Trump v Anderson. It does not follow logically that just because a presidential candidate does not meet the constitutional qualifications, that he or she cannot run for President. This is true partly because the presidential electors are the true candidates in November. It is also true because the Twentieth Amendment specifically provides for procedures when presidential electors in December choose a president who doesn’t meet the qualifications. It also ignores the fact that in the past, Wisconsin did print the name of a vice-presidential nominee on the ballot even though he was age 33.

Ayyadurai plans to appeal, although there is no possibility that he can be on the ballot this year.

Seventh Circuit Won’t Reconsider Indiana Ballot Access Case

On September 23, the Seventh Circuit refused to reconsider its August decision in Indiana Green Party v Morales, 23-2756. The issue was the number of signatures needed for statewide independent candidates, and the nominees of unqualified parties. No such petition had succeeded since 2000, except that in 2024, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s petition had also succeeded.

Indiana is one of only three states in which the Green Party presidential nominee has never appeared on the ballot. The others are Oklahoma and South Dakota.

Shiva Ayyadurai Removed from Louisiana Ballot Because He Chose a Prohibited Ballot Label

On August 30, the Louisiana Secretary of State wrote a letter to independent presidential candidate Shiva Ayyadurai, telling him that his place on the ballot was rejected because he had chosen the partisan label “independent”, and that word is prohibited because there is a ballot-qualified Independent Party in Louisiana.

Louisiana election procedures say that if a ballot label is rejected, the Secretary will communicate with the candidate to let him or her choose a different label. But the Secretary of State did not communicate that message. Also the letter didn’t arrive until August 30. And even though the letter said his filing fee check was being returned, the check was not returned.