Nebraska Governor Signs Bill that Makes it Easier for a Party to Remain Ballot-Qualified

On April 10, Nebraska Governor Dave Heineman signed LB 1035, which makes it easier for a party to remain ballot-qualified. Nebraska is the second state to pass such a bill this year; the first such state was Utah.

The old Nebraska law required a party to poll 5% (of the statewide vote) for some office, every two years. The new law says that when a party meets the 5% vote test, it is then ballot-qualified for four years.

This is the second ballot access law to pass in Nebraska this year. The first was the bill that eliminated the ban on out-of-state circulators.

Virginia Governor Asks Legislature to Amend Ballot Access Bill so as Not to Apply to Presidential Petitions

When Virginia Governors receive a bill from the legislature, they may sign the bill, veto the bill, or send it back to the legislature with suggested changes. When the Governor sends back a bill with suggestions, the legislature has one day to decide whether to accept the recommendation or not. If the legislature takes no action, the bill is enacted anyway; it is not vetoed.

On March 2, the Virginia legislature had passed a bill to help ballot access, effective immediately. HB 1151 says that if new U.S. House district boundaries aren’t in place by the start of the even-numbered election year, petitions are valid that year whether they use the old U.S. House district boundaries or the new boundaries. The bill has an urgency clause so as to take effect immediately.

On April 9, Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell sent the bill back to the legislature with suggested changes. He wants the bill to take effect in 2013, not now. Also he does not want the provisions of the bill to apply to any petition to place minor party or independent presidential candidates on the ballot, now or in the future. The legislature will decide in a one-day session on April 18 whether to pass this recommendation. The session starts at noon and must consider gubernatorial recommendations for approximately 120 bills.

Governor McDonnell’s suggestions for HB 1151 are shockingly unfair. The Libertarian and Green Parties had already started circulating their presidential petitions. Even though neither of these parties have presidential nominees yet, Virginia allows stand-in presidential and vice-presidential candidates, and lets such petitions start circulating on January 1 of a presidential election year. If the legislature accepts the Governor’s recommendations, the petitioning work already completed may be wasted. Virginia requires presidential petitions to include the candidates for presidential elector. Virginia also mandates that the petition carry the name of one candidate for elector from each U.S. House district. No one knew what the new district boundaries would be until March 14, when the U.S. Justice Department approved the new boundaries, so the minor party presidential electors were chosen based on the old districts. The State Board of Elections had been telling candidates to use old boundaries. Of course, petitioning for U.S. House candidates is also threatened by the Governor’s action. It is not known if there are any independent or minor party candidates for U.S. Senate this year, but if there are, and they already started petitioning, they would be injured also. U.S. Senate petitions, like presidential petitions, have a distribution requirement: 400 signatures per U.S. House district.

Virginians concerned about the Governor’s hostile recommendation ought to quickly communicate with their state legislators, asking the legislature not to accept Governor McDonnell’s recommendations to HB 1151. The Governor’s action was intrinsically hurtful, and it was also hurtful for him to wait until the very last day to send in a recommendation. The action was not posted on the legislature’s web page until the afternoon of April 10.

New Mexico Supreme Court Puts Various Candidates on Primary Ballots

On April 10, the New Mexico Supreme Court put several Republican and Democratic candidates on the June 5 primary ballots. The Court decided the case only 33 minutes after hearing the oral argument. See this story. The ballot access of some candidates had been challenged because their primary petitions didn’t include the number of the district. A few more cases remain to be settled. The Court seemed to feel that substantial compliance with petition technicalities is good enough.

Utah Elections Office Gives Newt Gingrich Until April 20 to Re-Pay Presidential Primary Filing Fee

According to this story, Newt Gingrich qualified for the Utah Republican presidential primary in March, by paying a filing fee of $500. But the check bounded. The story says Utah elections officials will not remove Gingrich from the ballot, provided he pays the fee by April 20. The Utah presidential primaries are on June 26, the latest in the nation this year.

The same lenient treatment was given to Jesse Jackson in 1984, when his check to pay the West Virginia filing fee also bounced. West Virginia’s Secretary of State permitted Jackson to send a new check, and he did appear on the West Virginia Democratic presidential primary ballot. Thanks to PoliticalWire for the link.

Opening Brief Filed in Vermont Supreme Court in Independent Candidate Petition Deadline Lawsuit

On April 10, Jerry Trudell filed his opening brief in the Vermont Supreme Court in Trudell v Markowitz. This is the lawsuit that challenges the petition deadline for independent candidates, and the nominees of unqualified parties. The 2009 session of the legislature moved the deadline from September to June. The primary is in August.

The lower Vermont state court had upheld the deadline, in a decision that did not even discuss the holding in Anderson v Celebrezze, the U.S. Supreme Court decision from 1983 that said early petition deadlines for independent candidates are unconstitutional. Instead the lower court based the decision on a 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Storer v Brown, which did not even concern petition deadlines for independent candidates. Instead, Storer v Brown upheld a law saying no one could be an independent candidate if he or she had been a member of a qualified party during the preceding year.

The appeal in Trudell’s case was helped by the Coalition for Free & Open Elections (COFOE), which helped raise money for the costs of preparing the transcript. Some of the readers of this blog helped with that fund appeal.

The 2009 legislature didn’t even carve out an exception for independent presidential candidates. Thus, the Green Party is severely disadvantaged in Vermont. It is not a ballot-qualified party, so it can only place its presidential nominee on the ballot by using the independent/minor party petition process. But the party won’t know who its national nominees will be until July 15, too late for the petition.