On July 1, the Sixth Circuit refused to re-hear Libertarian Party of Michigan v Ruth Johnson, the lawsuit over whether Michigan’s sore loser law applies to presidential primaries.
On June 27, the Washington, D.C., City Council passed B20-0245 on consent. It has a final reading on July 10, but since it passed First Reading on Consent, it is considered virtually passed. It repeals the ban on out-of-district petition circulators.
The Washington, D.C. City Council has passed a similar bill on December 18, 2012, but since that was an emergency bill, it was automatically terminated after 90 days. The current bill will make the repeal permanent.
See this story about the Centrist Party and its founder, Professor Charles Wheelan of Dartmouth. The story also includes an interview with Ken Block, founder of Rhode Island’s Moderate Party, which is ballot-qualified in Rhode Island.
Ballot Access News
June 1, 2013 – Volume 29, Number 1
| This issue was printed on white paper. |
Table of Contents
- SIXTH CIRCUIT RULES THAT SORE LOSER LAWS APPLY TO PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARIES
- CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY PASSES TWO BILLS TO LIMIT CHOICES
- NEBRASKA BALLOT ACCESS BILL SIGNED
- LEGISLATIVE NEWS
- OTHER LAWSUIT NEWS
- CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT FOR RIGHT TO VOTE
- FLORIDA MINOR PARTIES WIN RELIEF FROM LARGE FINES
- MINOR PARTY MEMBERS WHO RAN IN TOP-TWO PRIMARIES
- DESPITE DEMISE OF AMERICANS ELECT, SOME WANT A NEW CENTRIST PARTY
- TWELVE VISIONS PARTY QUALFIES FOR MASS. U.S. SENATE ELECTION
- LIBERTARIAN PARTY GAINS A SHERIFF
- GREEN WINS PARTISAN ELECTION
- SUBSCRIBING TO BAN WITH PAYPAL
In May 2013, Alabama Congressman Jo Bonner of the First District (in the southern part of the state) said he will resign from Congress on August 15. The Governor has said he can’t set an election schedule until August 15. Because no one knows when the special election will be, it is legally impossible for any minor party nominee, or independent candidate, to be circulating a petition for that election. The law requires signatures equal to 3% of the last gubernatorial vote within that district (5,938 signatures), due on primary day. No one knows when the primary will be. Petitions must carry the date of the election. Candidates running in a primary don’t need any petitions.
When the election dates are set, there will be a primary, a run-off primary six weeks later, and then the general election.
Alabama is in the Eleventh Circuit. In 1982, the Eleventh Circuit ruled in a Georgia case that when the normal petitioning time is not available, the state must either reduce the number of signatures or extend the deadline. That case was Citizens Party of Georgia v Poythress, 683 F 2d 418 (July 14, 1982). On remand, the U.S. District Court extended the deadline 30 days.
Since then, U.S. District Courts in states in the Eleventh Circuit have also either reduced petition requirements, or granted more time, or both, when the normal petitioning time is not available. Normal petitions in Alabama have two years for circulation, but if the Governor sets the dates of the primary on August 15, and he chooses a primary date in October (which is likely) then petitioning candidates will have only two months or so, which is only one-twelth of the normal time. Hence, if Alabama doesn’t voluntarily either lower the number of signatures, or extend the deadline substantially, a court would probably force either or both of those alternatives. In 2002, a U.S. District Court in Georgia, in Parker v Barnes, northern district, 1:02cv1883, lowered the petition deadline to two-thirds of the original requirement, because only two-thirds of the normal 180 days remained. In 1989, a U.S. District Court in Florida, in Migala v Martinez, northern district, 89-40168, lowered the petition from 3% to 1% and also granted an additional month in which to petition. In 1982, another U.S. District Court in Florida, in Turin v State, southern district, 82-1819-cv, extended the deadline from July 20 to September 27.